AOMEI Backupper vs Clonezilla

Struggling to choose between AOMEI Backupper and Clonezilla? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

AOMEI Backupper is a Backup & Sync solution with tags like backup, recovery, scheduling, encryption, incremental, differential.

It boasts features such as Disk backup, Partition backup, System backup, File backup, Schedule backup, Incremental backup, Differential backup, Backup compression & encryption, Backup splitting, Backup validation, Backup cloning, Universal restore, File sync and pros including Easy to use interface, Flexible backup options, Good performance, Free version available, Support for multiple destinations.

On the other hand, Clonezilla is a Os & Utilities product tagged with backup, cloning, imaging, recovery, restoration.

Its standout features include Disk imaging - Allows creating full disk images to preserve the entire contents of a drive, Disk cloning - Can clone drives or partitions for mass deployment, Multicast server - Can distribute images to multiple clients simultaneously, Supports multiple filesystems - Works with file systems like ext4, XFS, JFS, Btrfs, FAT, NTFS, Bootable live environment - Runs from a CD or USB without needing an OS installation, Open source - Free and open source software developed as a community project, Command line interface - Controlled fully via the CLI rather than a GUI, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy full system backup and recovery, Fast multicast deployment of disk images, Supports a wide range of file systems, Does not require installation or integration into an OS, Active development community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

AOMEI Backupper

AOMEI Backupper

AOMEI Backupper is a backup and recovery software for Windows PCs. It allows you to easily back up entire drives, partitions, system images, files and folders to local disks or NAS devices. It includes features like backup scheduling, file encryption, and incremental & differential backups.

Categories:
backup recovery scheduling encryption incremental differential

AOMEI Backupper Features

  1. Disk backup
  2. Partition backup
  3. System backup
  4. File backup
  5. Schedule backup
  6. Incremental backup
  7. Differential backup
  8. Backup compression & encryption
  9. Backup splitting
  10. Backup validation
  11. Backup cloning
  12. Universal restore
  13. File sync

Pricing

  • Freemium
  • One-time purchase

Pros

Easy to use interface

Flexible backup options

Good performance

Free version available

Support for multiple destinations

Cons

Limited features in free version

No cloud storage support

Lacks versioning

No mobile app


Clonezilla

Clonezilla

Clonezilla is an open source disk imaging and cloning software. It allows you to duplicate entire drives or partitions, create disk images, and restore disks from images. Useful for system backup, recovery, deployment, and disk migration.

Categories:
backup cloning imaging recovery restoration

Clonezilla Features

  1. Disk imaging - Allows creating full disk images to preserve the entire contents of a drive
  2. Disk cloning - Can clone drives or partitions for mass deployment
  3. Multicast server - Can distribute images to multiple clients simultaneously
  4. Supports multiple filesystems - Works with file systems like ext4, XFS, JFS, Btrfs, FAT, NTFS
  5. Bootable live environment - Runs from a CD or USB without needing an OS installation
  6. Open source - Free and open source software developed as a community project
  7. Command line interface - Controlled fully via the CLI rather than a GUI

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Easy full system backup and recovery

Fast multicast deployment of disk images

Supports a wide range of file systems

Does not require installation or integration into an OS

Active development community

Cons

No graphical user interface

Steep learning curve for command line usage

Limited reporting and logging capabilities

Requires some Linux knowledge to use effectively

Not as user friendly as commercial alternatives