Apache JMeter vs SilkPerformer

Struggling to choose between Apache JMeter and SilkPerformer? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Apache JMeter is a Development solution with tags like performance-testing, load-testing, web-application-testing, open-source.

It boasts features such as Load testing, Stress testing, Performance benchmarking, Web - HTTP, HTTPS, SOAP, REST, etc, Database via JDBC, FTP, LDAP, Message-oriented middleware (MOM) via JMS, Mail - SMTP(S), POP3(S) and IMAP(S), Native commands or shell scripts, TCP, Java Objects and pros including Open source, Cross platform (Windows, Linux, Mac), Highly extensible via plugins, Supports many protocols and technologies, CLI and GUI modes, Can be integrated with CI/CD pipelines, Good community support.

On the other hand, SilkPerformer is a Development product tagged with load-testing, stress-testing, scalability-testing, web-application-testing, database-testing.

Its standout features include Load testing, Stress testing, Scalability testing, Web performance testing, Database performance testing, API testing, Mobile app testing, Integrated test automation, and it shines with pros like Wide protocol support, Scripting flexibility, Detailed reporting, Integration with other Micro Focus tools, On-premise or SaaS options.

Feature	Apache JMeter	SilkPerformer
Overall Score	1	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Apache JMeter

Description: Apache JMeter, an open-source tool for performance and load testing of applications. Empower developers and testers to simulate various user scenarios, measure performance metrics, and identify bottlenecks. Apache JMeter supports a wide range of protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, SOAP, and more.

SilkPerformer

Description: SilkPerformer is a load and performance testing tool used to simulate hundreds or thousands of concurrent users accessing a web or database application. It helps identify bottlenecks and ensure application scalability.

Key Features Comparison

Apache JMeter Features

• Load testing
• Stress testing
• Performance benchmarking
• Web - HTTP, HTTPS, SOAP, REST, etc
• Database via JDBC
• FTP
• LDAP
• Message-oriented middleware (MOM) via JMS
• Mail - SMTP(S), POP3(S) and IMAP(S)
• Native commands or shell scripts
• TCP
• Java Objects

SilkPerformer Features

• Load testing
• Stress testing
• Scalability testing
• Web performance testing
• Database performance testing
• API testing
• Mobile app testing
• Integrated test automation

Pros & Cons Analysis

Apache JMeter

Pros

• Open source
• Cross platform (Windows, Linux, Mac)
• Highly extensible via plugins
• Supports many protocols and technologies
• CLI and GUI modes
• Can be integrated with CI/CD pipelines
• Good community support

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Configuring tests can be complex
• GUI has outdated design
• Not ideal for mobile app testing
• Lacks built-in developer collaboration features

SilkPerformer

Pros

• Wide protocol support
• Scripting flexibility
• Detailed reporting
• Integration with other Micro Focus tools
• On-premise or SaaS options

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Script maintenance can be challenging
• Limited support for latest web technologies
• Can be resource intensive for large tests

Pricing Comparison

Apache JMeter

• Open Source

SilkPerformer

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go