Apache Pulsar vs ActiveMQ

Struggling to choose between Apache Pulsar and ActiveMQ? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Apache Pulsar is a Development solution with tags like pubsub, messaging, distributed-systems, low-latency, durable-storage.

It boasts features such as Multi-tenancy, Geo-replication, Automatic data partitioning, Tiered storage, Low publish latency, Guaranteed message delivery, Multiple subscription modes and pros including High throughput, Low latency, Durable message storage, Flexible scalability, Multiple subscription modes.

On the other hand, ActiveMQ is a Development product tagged with messaging, queues, topics, jms.

Its standout features include Supports a variety of messaging protocols like AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, REST, STOMP, WebSocket, High performance and scalability using advanced broker clustering, Flexible deployment options including standalone, embedded, and cloud, Message persistence for reliability and recoverability, Security through authentication and authorization, Web-based admin console for management and monitoring, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Highly scalable and performant, Supports many languages and platforms, Lots of advanced messaging features, Popular and widely adopted, Great community support.

Feature	Apache Pulsar	ActiveMQ
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Apache Pulsar

Description: Apache Pulsar is an open-source distributed pub-sub messaging system originally created by Yahoo and now under the Apache Software Foundation. It is horizontally scalable, provides low latency and durable storage for messages.

ActiveMQ

Description: ActiveMQ is an open source message broker that implements the Java Message Service (JMS) API for sending, receiving, and persisting messages between distributed applications. It supports many advanced messaging features like message queues, topic publishing and subscribing, reliability, and security.

Key Features Comparison

Apache Pulsar Features

• Multi-tenancy
• Geo-replication
• Automatic data partitioning
• Tiered storage
• Low publish latency
• Guaranteed message delivery
• Multiple subscription modes

ActiveMQ Features

• Supports a variety of messaging protocols like AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, REST, STOMP, WebSocket
• High performance and scalability using advanced broker clustering
• Flexible deployment options including standalone, embedded, and cloud
• Message persistence for reliability and recoverability
• Security through authentication and authorization
• Web-based admin console for management and monitoring

Pros & Cons Analysis

Apache Pulsar

Pros

• High throughput
• Low latency
• Durable message storage
• Flexible scalability
• Multiple subscription modes

Cons

• Complex configuration
• Steep learning curve
• No built-in security features
• Limited monitoring and management tools

ActiveMQ

Pros

• Open source and free
• Highly scalable and performant
• Supports many languages and platforms
• Lots of advanced messaging features
• Popular and widely adopted
• Great community support

Cons

• Can have a steep learning curve
• Requires more resources than lighter-weight options
• Not as user friendly as some alternatives
• Lacks some very advanced features of proprietary options

Pricing Comparison

Apache Pulsar

• Open Source

ActiveMQ

• Open Source