Apache Tomcat vs Mako Server

Struggling to choose between Apache Tomcat and Mako Server? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Apache Tomcat is a Development solution with tags like java, servlet-container, web-server, java-ee.

It boasts features such as Servlet container, Implements Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages (JSP) specifications, Provides web server environment to run Java code, Supports HTTP connectors to serve web applications, Manages session data, Performs load balancing and pros including Open source and free, Widely used and supported, High performance, Extensive configuration options, Easy to deploy web applications, Integrates well with other Java EE technologies.

On the other hand, Mako Server is a Media & Entertainment product tagged with media, server, opensource, selfhosted, movies, tv-shows, music, photos.

Its standout features include Media library management, Automatic metadata retrieval, Transcoding, Device sync, Web-based UI, Plugin support, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Good community support, Extensive format support, Easy to set up and use, Customizable and extensible.

Feature	Apache Tomcat	Mako Server
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Media & Entertainment

Product Overview

Apache Tomcat

Description: Apache Tomcat is an open source Java Servlet Container that implements specifications from Java EE and Java Servlet. It provides a web server environment to run Java code and serve web applications.

Mako Server

Description: Mako Server is an open-source media server that allows you to store, organize, and stream your personal media library to various devices. It supports movies, TV shows, music, photos, and more.

Key Features Comparison

Apache Tomcat Features

• Servlet container
• Implements Java Servlet and JavaServer Pages (JSP) specifications
• Provides web server environment to run Java code
• Supports HTTP connectors to serve web applications
• Manages session data
• Performs load balancing

Mako Server Features

• Media library management
• Automatic metadata retrieval
• Transcoding
• Device sync
• Web-based UI
• Plugin support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Apache Tomcat

Pros

• Open source and free
• Widely used and supported
• High performance
• Extensive configuration options
• Easy to deploy web applications
• Integrates well with other Java EE technologies

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Not as feature rich as full Java EE application servers
• Additional configuration required for advanced features
• More memory intensive than basic web servers like Nginx

Mako Server

Pros

• Open source and free
• Good community support
• Extensive format support
• Easy to set up and use
• Customizable and extensible

Cons

• Lacks some features of commercial options
• Can be resource intensive
• Metadata not always fully accurate
• Mobile apps lack polish

Pricing Comparison

Apache Tomcat

• Open Source

Mako Server

• Open Source
• Free