Apache Traffic Server vs Polipo

Struggling to choose between Apache Traffic Server and Polipo? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Apache Traffic Server is a Network & Admin solution with tags like caching, proxy, performance, web-server.

It boasts features such as HTTP caching proxy, Load balancing, Origin shield, Bandwidth management, Header manipulation, Access control and pros including Open source, High performance, Scalable, Configurable, Reduces server load, Improves web performance.

On the other hand, Polipo is a Network & Admin product tagged with caching, web-proxy, bandwidth-saving.

Its standout features include HTTP proxy, Caching web proxy, Supports HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1, Disk and memory caching, Efficient cache storage, Configuration via text file, Supports SOCKS proxy chaining, and it shines with pros like Fast and lightweight, Improves browsing speed, Saves bandwidth, Easy to setup and configure, Actively maintained, Runs on multiple platforms.

Feature	Apache Traffic Server	Polipo
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Apache Traffic Server

Description: Apache Traffic Server is an open-source caching proxy server that is fast, scalable and configurable. It can improve web server performance by caching frequently accessed content and handling requests instead of web servers.

Polipo

Description: Polipo is a small and fast caching web proxy. It is designed to be used by one person or a small group of people. It caches websites, images, videos and other content to improve browsing speed and save bandwidth.

Key Features Comparison

Apache Traffic Server Features

• HTTP caching proxy
• Load balancing
• Origin shield
• Bandwidth management
• Header manipulation
• Access control

Polipo Features

• HTTP proxy
• Caching web proxy
• Supports HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1
• Disk and memory caching
• Efficient cache storage
• Configuration via text file
• Supports SOCKS proxy chaining

Pros & Cons Analysis

Apache Traffic Server

Pros

• Open source
• High performance
• Scalable
• Configurable
• Reduces server load
• Improves web performance

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Limited documentation
• Lacks GUI
• Requires expertise to configure

Polipo

Pros

• Fast and lightweight
• Improves browsing speed
• Saves bandwidth
• Easy to setup and configure
• Actively maintained
• Runs on multiple platforms

Cons

• No web-based interface
• Limited configuration options
• Not designed for large groups
• No access control or authentication

Pricing Comparison

Apache Traffic Server

• Open Source

Polipo

• Open Source