Arachni vs OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Arachni icon
Arachni
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) icon
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Arachni and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Arachni is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like web-security, vulnerability-scanning, ruby.

It boasts features such as Full audit of web applications, Highlights vulnerabilities like SQL injections, XSS, etc, Flexible framework for writing custom plugins, Command line and web UI available, Integrates with continuous integration tools, Performs authenticated scans, Open source and free and pros including Powerful vulnerability scanner, Easy to use and integrate, Extendable via plugins, Well maintained and updated frequently.

On the other hand, OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is a Security & Privacy product tagged with security, web-app-scanner, vulnerability-scanner, penetration-testing, owasp.

Its standout features include Spidering and crawling of web applications, Passive scanning for analysis of requests and responses, Active scanning for vulnerability detection, AJAX spidering for crawling of modern web apps, Variety of attack tools for penetration testing, Extensible via add-ons for advanced functions, Built-in proxy for traffic inspection and modification, Automated and manual testing options, Command line and GUI interfaces, Authentication tools for session management, Integrations with CI/CD pipelines, APIs for integration with other tools, Exporting of reports in various formats, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to use interface, Powerful scanning capabilities, Active community support and development, Cross-platform compatibility, Extensible and customizable via plugins, Integrates well with other tools, Helps identify a wide range of vulnerabilities.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Arachni and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)?

When evaluating Arachni versus OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), both solutions serve different needs within the security & privacy ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Arachni and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) have established themselves in the security & privacy market. Key areas include web-security, vulnerability-scanning, ruby.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Arachni and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include web-security, vulnerability-scanning, ruby.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include web-security, vulnerability-scanning and security, web-app-scanner.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Arachni and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP). You might also explore web-security, vulnerability-scanning, ruby for alternative approaches.

Feature Arachni OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Security & Privacy Security & Privacy
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Arachni
Arachni

Description: Arachni is an open source web application security scanner written in Ruby. It can crawl websites to map out all available pages and analyze the pages to detect common web vulnerabilities like SQL injections, XSS, and more.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

Description: ZAP is an open-source web application security scanner used to find vulnerabilities in web apps. It offers automated and manual tools to scan APIs, access control weaknesses, injection flaws, XSS, and other issues.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Arachni
Arachni Features
  • Full audit of web applications
  • Highlights vulnerabilities like SQL injections, XSS, etc
  • Flexible framework for writing custom plugins
  • Command line and web UI available
  • Integrates with continuous integration tools
  • Performs authenticated scans
  • Open source and free
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) Features
  • Spidering and crawling of web applications
  • Passive scanning for analysis of requests and responses
  • Active scanning for vulnerability detection
  • AJAX spidering for crawling of modern web apps
  • Variety of attack tools for penetration testing
  • Extensible via add-ons for advanced functions
  • Built-in proxy for traffic inspection and modification
  • Automated and manual testing options
  • Command line and GUI interfaces
  • Authentication tools for session management
  • Integrations with CI/CD pipelines
  • APIs for integration with other tools
  • Exporting of reports in various formats

Pros & Cons Analysis

Arachni
Arachni
Pros
  • Powerful vulnerability scanner
  • Easy to use and integrate
  • Extendable via plugins
  • Well maintained and updated frequently
Cons
  • Can generate false positives
  • Limited reporting compared to commercial tools
  • Steep learning curve for custom plugins
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to use interface
  • Powerful scanning capabilities
  • Active community support and development
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Extensible and customizable via plugins
  • Integrates well with other tools
  • Helps identify a wide range of vulnerabilities
Cons
  • Can generate false positives
  • Limited default policies for authentication
  • Requires expertise to leverage advanced features
  • Not as feature rich as commercial products
  • Lacks official technical support services

Pricing Comparison

Arachni
Arachni
  • Open Source
  • Free
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs