ArchiveBox vs SiteSucker

Struggling to choose between ArchiveBox and SiteSucker? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

ArchiveBox is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like archiving, web-archiving, selfhosted, open-source.

It boasts features such as Web page archiving, Media asset collection, Local browsing of archived sites, Scheduled archiving, Deduplication, Full-text search, Open source and pros including Self-hosted, Customizable, Offline browsing, Long-term preservation, Free and open source.

On the other hand, SiteSucker is a Web Browsers product tagged with website, downloader, offline, browsing.

Its standout features include Downloads entire websites for offline browsing, Automatically scans and downloads web pages, images, CSS, JavaScript, etc., Supports FTP and SFTP sites in addition to HTTP/HTTPS, Resumes broken downloads, Filters downloads by file type, size, date, etc, Scheduled and automated downloading, and it shines with pros like Fast and easy full website downloads, Preserves original website structure and assets, Great for archiving sites or researching them offline, Wide protocol support beyond just HTTP, Powerful filtering and automation capabilities.

Feature	ArchiveBox	SiteSucker
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Os & Utilities	Web Browsers

Product Overview

ArchiveBox

Description: ArchiveBox is an open source self-hosted web archiving solution that lets you archive web pages and collect media assets. It aims to create local, browsable copies of sites from the internet.

SiteSucker

Description: SiteSucker is a Mac application that allows users to download entire websites for offline browsing. It automatically scans sites and downloads web pages, images, CSS, JavaScript, and other files.

Key Features Comparison

ArchiveBox Features

• Web page archiving
• Media asset collection
• Local browsing of archived sites
• Scheduled archiving
• Deduplication
• Full-text search
• Open source

SiteSucker Features

• Downloads entire websites for offline browsing
• Automatically scans and downloads web pages, images, CSS, JavaScript, etc.
• Supports FTP and SFTP sites in addition to HTTP/HTTPS
• Resumes broken downloads
• Filters downloads by file type, size, date, etc
• Scheduled and automated downloading

Pros & Cons Analysis

ArchiveBox

Pros

• Self-hosted
• Customizable
• Offline browsing
• Long-term preservation
• Free and open source

Cons

• Requires technical setup
• No browser extension
• Limited to individual use

SiteSucker

Pros

• Fast and easy full website downloads
• Preserves original website structure and assets
• Great for archiving sites or researching them offline
• Wide protocol support beyond just HTTP
• Powerful filtering and automation capabilities

Cons

• Mac only
• No Windows or Linux version
• Can generate heavy bandwidth usage
• No browser integration
• Limited scheduling options

Pricing Comparison

ArchiveBox

• Open Source

SiteSucker

• One-time Purchase