Automake vs SCons

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Automake icon
Automake
SCons icon
SCons

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Automake and SCons? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Automake is a Development solution with tags like make, automake, build, gnu.

It boasts features such as Automatically generates Makefile.am files from Makefile.in files, Supports automatic dependency tracking and parallel builds, Integrates with Autoconf to provide a full build environment, Supports various languages like C, C++, Fortran, Java, Objective-C, Handles library dependencies and subdirectories seamlessly, Allows overriding defaults and customization through config files and pros including Saves time by automating Makefile creation, Promotes standardization and best practices for builds, Simplifies build configuration for large, complex projects, Easy to integrate with build tools like Autoconf and Libtool, Actively maintained and well-documented.

On the other hand, SCons is a Development product tagged with build, automation, python.

Its standout features include Dependency tracking, Parallel builds, Caching, Extensible with Python scripts, Cross-platform, and it shines with pros like Fast incremental builds, Easily customizable, Good dependency management, Built-in support for many languages.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Automake and SCons?

When evaluating Automake versus SCons, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Automake and SCons have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include make, automake, build.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Automake and SCons significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include make, automake, build, gnu.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include make, automake and build, automation.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Automake and SCons. You might also explore make, automake, build for alternative approaches.

Feature Automake SCons
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Automake
Automake

Description: Automake is a tool for automatically generating Makefile.am files that comply with the GNU coding standards. It simplifies the creation and maintenance of Makefiles for complex software projects.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

SCons
SCons

Description: SCons is an open source software construction tool that is used to build software applications and libraries. It is written in Python and uses Python scripts for its configuration files making it easy to customize and extend.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Automake
Automake Features
  • Automatically generates Makefile.am files from Makefile.in files
  • Supports automatic dependency tracking and parallel builds
  • Integrates with Autoconf to provide a full build environment
  • Supports various languages like C, C++, Fortran, Java, Objective-C
  • Handles library dependencies and subdirectories seamlessly
  • Allows overriding defaults and customization through config files
SCons
SCons Features
  • Dependency tracking
  • Parallel builds
  • Caching
  • Extensible with Python scripts
  • Cross-platform

Pros & Cons Analysis

Automake
Automake
Pros
  • Saves time by automating Makefile creation
  • Promotes standardization and best practices for builds
  • Simplifies build configuration for large, complex projects
  • Easy to integrate with build tools like Autoconf and Libtool
  • Actively maintained and well-documented
Cons
  • Yet another build tool to learn
  • Limited flexibility compared to handwritten Makefiles
  • Not as feature-rich as some alternatives like CMake
  • Requires GNU build tools and may not work on all platforms
  • Can have a steep learning curve
SCons
SCons
Pros
  • Fast incremental builds
  • Easily customizable
  • Good dependency management
  • Built-in support for many languages
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Limited adoption compared to Make/CMake
  • Less flexible than general purpose build tools like Make

Pricing Comparison

Automake
Automake
  • Open Source
SCons
SCons
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Automake
Automake
Automake
Learn More About Automake
SCons
SCons
SCons
Learn More About SCons

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Find your fit.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal