Azkaban vs Apache Airflow

Struggling to choose between Azkaban and Apache Airflow? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Azkaban is a Ai Tools & Services solution with tags like workflow, scheduler, hadoop, jobs, open-source.

It boasts features such as Web-based workflow scheduler, Allows creating, managing and monitoring workflows, Built-in authentication and authorization, Supports workflow dependencies, Provides execution logs and metrics, Plugin system for extensibility, Alerting and failure handling and pros including Open source and free, Easy to use interface, Scalable and reliable, Integrates well with Hadoop, Good documentation and community support.

On the other hand, Apache Airflow is a Ai Tools & Services product tagged with scheduling, pipelines, workflows, data-pipelines, etl.

Its standout features include Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) - modeling workflows as code, Dynamic task scheduling, Extensible plugins, Integration with databases, S3, and other environments, Monitoring, alerting, and logging, Scalable - handles data pipelines across organizations, Web server & UI to visualize pipelines, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Active community support, Modular and customizable, Robust scheduling capabilities, Integration with many services and databases, Scales to large workflows.

Feature	Azkaban	Apache Airflow
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Ai Tools & Services	Ai Tools & Services

Product Overview

Azkaban

Description: Azkaban is an open source workflow scheduler created at LinkedIn to run Hadoop jobs. It allows users to easily create, schedule and monitor workflows made up of different jobs. Azkaban provides a web interface and scheduling capabilities to manage dependencies between jobs.

Apache Airflow

Description: Apache Airflow is an open-source workflow management platform used to programmatically author, schedule and monitor workflows. It provides a graphical interface to visualize pipelines and integrates with databases and other environments.

Key Features Comparison

Azkaban Features

• Web-based workflow scheduler
• Allows creating, managing and monitoring workflows
• Built-in authentication and authorization
• Supports workflow dependencies
• Provides execution logs and metrics
• Plugin system for extensibility
• Alerting and failure handling

Apache Airflow Features

• Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) - modeling workflows as code
• Dynamic task scheduling
• Extensible plugins
• Integration with databases, S3, and other environments
• Monitoring, alerting, and logging
• Scalable - handles data pipelines across organizations
• Web server & UI to visualize pipelines

Pros & Cons Analysis

Azkaban

Pros

• Open source and free
• Easy to use interface
• Scalable and reliable
• Integrates well with Hadoop
• Good documentation and community support

Cons

• Limited visualization and monitoring
• Steep learning curve for advanced features
• Not ideal for real-time workflows
• No commercial support offered

Apache Airflow

Pros

• Open source and free
• Active community support
• Modular and customizable
• Robust scheduling capabilities
• Integration with many services and databases
• Scales to large workflows

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Can be complex to set up and manage
• Upgrades can break DAGs
• No native support for real-time streaming
• UI and API need improvement

Pricing Comparison

Azkaban

• Open Source

Apache Airflow

• Open Source