Bcfg2 vs Propellor

Struggling to choose between Bcfg2 and Propellor? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Bcfg2 is a Network & Admin solution with tags like configuration-management, drift-detection, desired-state.

It boasts features such as Configuration management, Managing large server environments, Automated configuration monitoring, Detect and correct configuration drift, Declarative configuration modeling, Integration with Puppet, Chef, etc, Plugin architecture and pros including Powerful configuration modeling, Scales to large environments, Detects and fixes drift, Integrates with other tools, Open source and free.

On the other hand, Propellor is a Development product tagged with opensource, haskell, configuration-management, deployment.

Its standout features include Declarative configuration language, Idempotent system configuration, Manages hosts and services, Written in Haskell, and it shines with pros like Declarative syntax makes configurations easy to read and maintain, Being purely functional avoids side effects and ensures reproducibility, Type safety prevents many errors.

Feature	Bcfg2	Propellor
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Development

Product Overview

Bcfg2

Description: Bcfg2 is an open-source configuration management system that helps administrators maintain an overview of the configuration of many computers. It allows defining desired configuration states and automatically correcting any detected differences or 'drift'.

Propellor

Description: Propellor is an open-source configuration management tool written in Haskell. It uses a declarative domain-specific language to define system configurations, allowing developers to manage and deploy hosts and services with a high-level syntax.

Key Features Comparison

Bcfg2 Features

• Configuration management
• Managing large server environments
• Automated configuration monitoring
• Detect and correct configuration drift
• Declarative configuration modeling
• Integration with Puppet, Chef, etc
• Plugin architecture

Propellor Features

• Declarative configuration language
• Idempotent system configuration
• Manages hosts and services
• Written in Haskell

Pros & Cons Analysis

Bcfg2

Pros

• Powerful configuration modeling
• Scales to large environments
• Detects and fixes drift
• Integrates with other tools
• Open source and free

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Less flexible than pure scripting
• Limited adoption compared to Puppet/Chef/Ansible
• No commercial support available

Propellor

Pros

• Declarative syntax makes configurations easy to read and maintain
• Being purely functional avoids side effects and ensures reproducibility
• Type safety prevents many errors

Cons

• Steep learning curve for Haskell syntax
• Limited adoption outside of Haskell community

Pricing Comparison

Bcfg2

• Open Source

Propellor

• Open Source