BloodHound vs Metasploit

Struggling to choose between BloodHound and Metasploit? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

BloodHound is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like active-directory, attack-path-analysis, privilege-escalation, relationship-mapping, microsoft-windows.

It boasts features such as Graph database showing relationships between Active Directory objects, Identifies privilege escalation paths and access control vulnerabilities, Visualizes effective permissions and trusts, Integrates data from LDAP and Kerberos, Built on Neo4j graph database and pros including Open source and free to use, Powerful visualization of AD environments, Helps identify attack vectors and security holes, Large user community providing support.

On the other hand, Metasploit is a Security & Privacy product tagged with exploitation, vulnerability-testing, offensive-security.

Its standout features include Exploit database, Payload database, Auxiliary modules, Evasion modules, Post-exploitation modules, Scripting engine, and it shines with pros like Comprehensive and frequently updated exploit database, Large collection of payloads, Modular architecture, Built-in evasion techniques, Powerful CLI and scripting capabilities, Active community support.

Feature	BloodHound	Metasploit
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Security & Privacy	Security & Privacy

Product Overview

BloodHound

Description: BloodHound is an open source security tool used to analyze Active Directory environments and find relationships between different objects. It helps identify attack paths that could potentially allow an attacker to escalate privileges.

Metasploit

Description: Metasploit is an open source penetration testing framework that helps security professionals find, exploit, and validate vulnerabilities. It includes a database of known exploits and payloads that can be used to simulate attacks against systems to test their security.

Key Features Comparison

BloodHound Features

• Graph database showing relationships between Active Directory objects
• Identifies privilege escalation paths and access control vulnerabilities
• Visualizes effective permissions and trusts
• Integrates data from LDAP and Kerberos
• Built on Neo4j graph database

Metasploit Features

• Exploit database
• Payload database
• Auxiliary modules
• Evasion modules
• Post-exploitation modules
• Scripting engine

Pros & Cons Analysis

BloodHound

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• Powerful visualization of AD environments
• Helps identify attack vectors and security holes
• Large user community providing support

Cons

• Requires installing Neo4j database
• Steep learning curve
• Does not fix vulnerabilities, only identifies them

Metasploit

Pros

• Comprehensive and frequently updated exploit database
• Large collection of payloads
• Modular architecture
• Built-in evasion techniques
• Powerful CLI and scripting capabilities
• Active community support

Cons

• Can be complex for beginners
• Requires familiarity with penetration testing concepts
• Exploits can be unreliable and may crash targets
• Legal and ethical concerns around offensive security testing

Pricing Comparison

BloodHound

• Open Source

Metasploit

• Open Source
• Free