BoxedApp Packer vs Thincast

Struggling to choose between BoxedApp Packer and Thincast? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

BoxedApp Packer is a Development solution with tags like packaging, bundling, dependencies, executable.

It boasts features such as Bundles applications and dependencies into a single executable, Supports Windows, Mac and Linux platforms, Open source and free, Simple drag-and-drop interface, Customizable installer creation, Command line interface available, Plugins allow extending functionality and pros including Easy to package and distribute apps, Works across multiple platforms, Free and open source, User-friendly GUI, Customizable installers, Extendable with plugins.

On the other hand, Thincast is a Remote Work & Education product tagged with remote-desktop, vdi, virtual-desktop, desktop-virtualization.

Its standout features include Allows companies to deploy virtual Windows desktops from their data center, Provides secure remote access to applications and data, Supports a variety of endpoints including PCs, tablets, smartphones, Offers multi-monitor support, Includes load balancing and autoscaling capabilities, and it shines with pros like Enables workforce mobility and remote working, Centralized management of desktops from one location, Improves security by keeping data in the data center, Reduces hardware costs by virtualizing desktops, Scales quickly to meet changing business needs.

Feature	BoxedApp Packer	Thincast
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Remote Work & Education

Product Overview

BoxedApp Packer

Description: BoxedApp Packer is a software packaging tool that allows developers to package applications, along with their dependencies and settings, into a single executable bundle that can be distributed. It supports Windows, Mac, and Linux.

Thincast

Description: Thincast is a virtual desktop infrastructure software that allows companies to deploy Windows desktops from their data center to any device. It provides secure remote access to applications and data.

Key Features Comparison

BoxedApp Packer Features

• Bundles applications and dependencies into a single executable
• Supports Windows, Mac and Linux platforms
• Open source and free
• Simple drag-and-drop interface
• Customizable installer creation
• Command line interface available
• Plugins allow extending functionality

Thincast Features

• Allows companies to deploy virtual Windows desktops from their data center
• Provides secure remote access to applications and data
• Supports a variety of endpoints including PCs, tablets, smartphones
• Offers multi-monitor support
• Includes load balancing and autoscaling capabilities

Pros & Cons Analysis

BoxedApp Packer

Pros

• Easy to package and distribute apps
• Works across multiple platforms
• Free and open source
• User-friendly GUI
• Customizable installers
• Extendable with plugins

Cons

• Limited to packaging apps, not full system imaging
• Less configurable than some alternatives
• Requires some knowledge of command line and scripting
• Not many advanced or enterprise-level features

Thincast

Pros

• Enables workforce mobility and remote working
• Centralized management of desktops from one location
• Improves security by keeping data in the data center
• Reduces hardware costs by virtualizing desktops
• Scales quickly to meet changing business needs

Cons

• Can be complex to set up and manage
• Requires robust network connectivity
• Desktop performance relies on network bandwidth
• Upfront licensing costs
• VDI expertise needed for implementation

Pricing Comparison

BoxedApp Packer

• Open Source

Thincast

• Subscription-Based