Browserling vs Endtest

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Browserling icon
Browserling
Endtest icon
Endtest

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Browserling and Endtest? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Browserling is a Web Browsers solution with tags like crossbrowser, testing, emulation.

It boasts features such as Cross-browser testing, Test website on multiple browsers, Emulates various browser and OS configurations, Live interactive browser testing, Screenshot comparisons, Mobile browser testing, Browser version testing, Browser compatibility testing and pros including Test across many browsers and OS, No need to install browsers locally, Easy to use interface, Good for quick testing, Affordable pricing.

On the other hand, Endtest is a Development product tagged with load-testing, performance-testing, web-application-testing.

Its standout features include Record and replay scripts to simulate user interactions, Support for multiple protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, SOAP, REST, FTP, and more, Distributed load testing using multiple machines, Detailed performance metrics and customizable reports, Command line interface and integration with CI/CD pipelines, Open source and self-hosted option available, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to use interface, Support for advanced scripting and extensibility, Scales to thousands of concurrent users, Detailed and customizable analytics.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Browserling and Endtest?

When evaluating Browserling versus Endtest, both solutions serve different needs within the web browsers ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Browserling and Endtest have established themselves in the web browsers market. Key areas include crossbrowser, testing, emulation.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Browserling and Endtest significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include crossbrowser, testing, emulation.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include crossbrowser, testing and load-testing, performance-testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Browserling and Endtest. You might also explore crossbrowser, testing, emulation for alternative approaches.

Feature Browserling Endtest
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Web Browsers Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Browserling
Browserling

Description: Browserling is a cross-browser testing tool that allows you to test your website in multiple browsers online. It emulates various browser and operating system configurations so you can see how your site looks and functions across different environments.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Endtest
Endtest

Description: Endtest is an open-source load and performance testing tool for web applications. It allows users to simulate large numbers of virtual users accessing a web application to test overall system performance and capacity.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Browserling
Browserling Features
  • Cross-browser testing
  • Test website on multiple browsers
  • Emulates various browser and OS configurations
  • Live interactive browser testing
  • Screenshot comparisons
  • Mobile browser testing
  • Browser version testing
  • Browser compatibility testing
Endtest
Endtest Features
  • Record and replay scripts to simulate user interactions
  • Support for multiple protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, SOAP, REST, FTP, and more
  • Distributed load testing using multiple machines
  • Detailed performance metrics and customizable reports
  • Command line interface and integration with CI/CD pipelines
  • Open source and self-hosted option available

Pros & Cons Analysis

Browserling
Browserling
Pros
  • Test across many browsers and OS
  • No need to install browsers locally
  • Easy to use interface
  • Good for quick testing
  • Affordable pricing
Cons
  • Limited testing time on free plan
  • No automated testing
  • No detailed error logging
  • Not meant for comprehensive testing
Endtest
Endtest
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to use interface
  • Support for advanced scripting and extensibility
  • Scales to thousands of concurrent users
  • Detailed and customizable analytics
Cons
  • Limited to web application testing
  • Steep learning curve for advanced scripting
  • Not as feature rich as commercial solutions

Pricing Comparison

Browserling
Browserling
  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based
Endtest
Endtest
  • Open Source
  • Free
  • Freemium

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs