bspwm vs Xmonad

Struggling to choose between bspwm and Xmonad? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

bspwm is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like tiling, keyboarddriven, lightweight, binary-space-partitioning, efficient-screen-space, external-configuration.

It boasts features such as Binary space partitioning window layout, Keyboard driven window management, Flexible rule-based configuration, Support for multi-monitor setups, Minimal resource usage and pros including Very efficient use of screen space, Highly customizable with scripts, Lightweight and fast, Keyboard shortcuts for window management, Low memory footprint.

On the other hand, Xmonad is a Os & Utilities product tagged with tiling, haskell, unix, linux, window-manager.

Its standout features include Tiling window manager, Configurable in Haskell, Dynamic window management, Keyboard-driven workflow, Extensible through plugins, and it shines with pros like Highly customizable, Very efficient use of screen space, Keyboard shortcuts for everything, Lightweight and fast.

Feature	bspwm	Xmonad
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Os & Utilities	Os & Utilities

Product Overview

bspwm

Description: bspwm is a lightweight, keyboard-driven tiling window manager for Linux. It organizes windows in a binary space partitioning layout for efficient use of screen space. Configuration is done mostly through external scripts rather than built-in settings.

Xmonad

Description: Xmonad is a tiling window manager for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. It is written in Haskell and dynamically manages windows to maximize screen space and productivity.

Key Features Comparison

bspwm Features

• Binary space partitioning window layout
• Keyboard driven window management
• Flexible rule-based configuration
• Support for multi-monitor setups
• Minimal resource usage

Xmonad Features

• Tiling window manager
• Configurable in Haskell
• Dynamic window management
• Keyboard-driven workflow
• Extensible through plugins

Pros & Cons Analysis

bspwm

Pros

• Very efficient use of screen space
• Highly customizable with scripts
• Lightweight and fast
• Keyboard shortcuts for window management
• Low memory footprint

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Manual configuration required
• Lack of GUI or menu
• Not beginner friendly
• Requires external scripts for some functionality

Xmonad

Pros

• Highly customizable
• Very efficient use of screen space
• Keyboard shortcuts for everything
• Lightweight and fast

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Configuration requires Haskell knowledge
• Not beginner friendly

Pricing Comparison

bspwm

• Open Source

Xmonad

• Open Source