Build Quorum vs Civist

Struggling to choose between Build Quorum and Civist? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Build Quorum is a Bitcoin & Cryptocurrency solution with tags like blockchain, ethereum, consortium, private-networks, confidential-transactions.

It boasts features such as Private/consortium blockchain, Confidential transactions, Voting systems, Permissioned access and pros including High transaction speed, Enhanced privacy, Lower costs than public blockchains, Open source codebase.

On the other hand, Civist is a Online Services product tagged with petitions, volunteering, events, open-source.

Its standout features include Petition management, Volunteer management, Event management, Crowdfunding, Custom forms, Profile management, Notification system, Access control, Multilingual support, API access, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Easy to use, Good feature set, Active development community, Customizable and extensible.

Feature	Build Quorum	Civist
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Bitcoin & Cryptocurrency	Online Services

Product Overview

Build Quorum

Description: Build Quorum is an open source blockchain platform designed for private and consortium networks to enable confidential transactions between known parties. It is based on the Ethereum codebase and provides data privacy, voting systems, and enhanced permissioning.

Civist

Description: Civist is an open source civic engagement platform that allows organizations to manage petitions, volunteer opportunities, events, and more. It helps connect citizens with causes they care about.

Key Features Comparison

Build Quorum Features

• Private/consortium blockchain
• Confidential transactions
• Voting systems
• Permissioned access

Civist Features

• Petition management
• Volunteer management
• Event management
• Crowdfunding
• Custom forms
• Profile management
• Notification system
• Access control
• Multilingual support
• API access

Pros & Cons Analysis

Build Quorum

Pros

• High transaction speed
• Enhanced privacy
• Lower costs than public blockchains
• Open source codebase

Cons

• Limited decentralization
• Less tested than public chains
• Requires some technical expertise

Civist

Pros

• Open source and free
• Easy to use
• Good feature set
• Active development community
• Customizable and extensible

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Steep learning curve for non-technical users
• Not as full-featured as some commercial options

Pricing Comparison

Build Quorum

• Open Source

Civist

• Open Source