Buildr vs qmake

Struggling to choose between Buildr and qmake? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Buildr is a Development solution with tags like ruby, java, c, scala, build, automation.

It boasts features such as Ruby DSL for build configuration, Supports multiple languages like Java, Scala, Groovy, Clojure, C/C++, Built-in support for testing frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, Specs, Parallel builds, Built-in dependency management, IDE integration, Continuous integration support and pros including Simple and expressive Ruby DSL, Cross-platform and cross-language support, Active open source community, Integrates well with other tools, Fast parallel builds.

On the other hand, qmake is a Development product tagged with qt, make, build-automation, project-configuration.

Its standout features include Cross-platform build automation, Simplified build system for Qt applications, Automatic generation of Makefiles, Supports various compilers and build environments, Includes pre-defined build rules for Qt modules, Allows for custom build configurations, Provides dependency management for Qt libraries, and it shines with pros like Streamlines the build process for Qt projects, Reduces the complexity of managing build configurations, Ensures consistent build environments across platforms, Integrates well with the Qt framework, Extensive documentation and community support.

Feature	Buildr	qmake
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Buildr

Description: Buildr is an open-source software build system and project automation tool. It is written in Ruby and is designed for building Java, C/C++, Ruby, Scala and other language projects with ease. Buildr handles compilation, packaging, testing, and deployment.

qmake

Description: qmake is a build automation and project configuration tool used primarily for projects using Qt. It automates the generation of Makefiles for building Qt applications. qmake helps simplify the build system for developers.

Key Features Comparison

Buildr Features

• Ruby DSL for build configuration
• Supports multiple languages like Java, Scala, Groovy, Clojure, C/C++
• Built-in support for testing frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, Specs
• Parallel builds
• Built-in dependency management
• IDE integration
• Continuous integration support

qmake Features

• Cross-platform build automation
• Simplified build system for Qt applications
• Automatic generation of Makefiles
• Supports various compilers and build environments
• Includes pre-defined build rules for Qt modules
• Allows for custom build configurations
• Provides dependency management for Qt libraries

Pros & Cons Analysis

Buildr

Pros

• Simple and expressive Ruby DSL
• Cross-platform and cross-language support
• Active open source community
• Integrates well with other tools
• Fast parallel builds

Cons

• Steep learning curve for Ruby DSL
• Limited adoption compared to Maven/Gradle
• Not as feature-rich as some alternatives

qmake

Pros

• Streamlines the build process for Qt projects
• Reduces the complexity of managing build configurations
• Ensures consistent build environments across platforms
• Integrates well with the Qt framework
• Extensive documentation and community support

Cons

• Limited functionality outside of the Qt ecosystem
• Steep learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Qt
• Potential performance issues for large-scale projects

Pricing Comparison

Buildr

• Open Source

qmake

• Open Source