cdist vs Propellor

Struggling to choose between cdist and Propellor? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

cdist is a System & Hardware solution with tags like configuration-management, automation, python.

It boasts features such as Configuration management, Infrastructure as code, Agentless architecture, Parallel execution, Python-based manifests, Customizable via plugins and pros including Lightweight and fast, Easy to get started, Powerful templating capabilities, Good for bootstrapping, Active open source community.

On the other hand, Propellor is a Development product tagged with opensource, haskell, configuration-management, deployment.

Its standout features include Declarative configuration language, Idempotent system configuration, Manages hosts and services, Written in Haskell, and it shines with pros like Declarative syntax makes configurations easy to read and maintain, Being purely functional avoids side effects and ensures reproducibility, Type safety prevents many errors.

Feature	cdist	Propellor
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	System & Hardware	Development

Product Overview

cdist

Description: cdist is an open source configuration management tool written in Python. It allows system administrators to define the configuration of servers and deploy it to multiple machines in parallel. cdist works by running small scripts called 'manifests' on remote hosts.

Propellor

Description: Propellor is an open-source configuration management tool written in Haskell. It uses a declarative domain-specific language to define system configurations, allowing developers to manage and deploy hosts and services with a high-level syntax.

Key Features Comparison

cdist Features

• Configuration management
• Infrastructure as code
• Agentless architecture
• Parallel execution
• Python-based manifests
• Customizable via plugins

Propellor Features

• Declarative configuration language
• Idempotent system configuration
• Manages hosts and services
• Written in Haskell

Pros & Cons Analysis

cdist

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Easy to get started
• Powerful templating capabilities
• Good for bootstrapping
• Active open source community

Cons

• Limited adoption and support
• Steep learning curve
• Not ideal for large environments
• No graphical interface

Propellor

Pros

• Declarative syntax makes configurations easy to read and maintain
• Being purely functional avoids side effects and ensures reproducibility
• Type safety prevents many errors

Cons

• Steep learning curve for Haskell syntax
• Limited adoption outside of Haskell community

Pricing Comparison

cdist

• Open Source

Propellor

• Open Source