Centreon Enterprise Server vs Cacti

Struggling to choose between Centreon Enterprise Server and Cacti? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Centreon Enterprise Server is a Network & Admin solution with tags like monitoring, infrastructure, availability, open-source.

It boasts features such as Real-time monitoring and alerting, Customizable dashboards and reporting, Automatic discovery of IT assets, Event correlation and root cause analysis, Integration with multiple data sources, Centralized configuration management, Scalable distributed monitoring architecture, REST APIs for integration and automation and pros including Open source and free to use, Highly customizable and extensible, Large extension ecosystem and community support, Supports monitoring of diverse environments and technologies, Intuitive web interface for easy access and visibility, Available as software or virtual appliance for quick deployment.

On the other hand, Cacti is a Network & Admin product tagged with network, monitoring, graphing, statistics.

Its standout features include Graphing and monitoring tool for network devices, Supports SNMP polling for data collection, Customizable graphs and dashboards, Threshold-based alerting, Supports RRDTool for data storage, Web-based interface, Plugin architecture for extendibility, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to install and configure, Wide range of supported devices, Flexible and customizable, Active community support.

Feature	Centreon Enterprise Server	Cacti
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Centreon Enterprise Server

Description: Centreon Enterprise Server is an open source IT infrastructure and network monitoring platform. It provides visibility into systems, networks, and infrastructure to detect problems and ensure high availability.

Cacti

Description: Cacti is an open-source network monitoring and graphing tool that provides easy monitoring of network devices and servers. It polls devices for utilization data, stores the data, and generates graphs and statistics to help analyze network traffic and utilization.

Key Features Comparison

Centreon Enterprise Server Features

• Real-time monitoring and alerting
• Customizable dashboards and reporting
• Automatic discovery of IT assets
• Event correlation and root cause analysis
• Integration with multiple data sources
• Centralized configuration management
• Scalable distributed monitoring architecture
• REST APIs for integration and automation

Cacti Features

• Graphing and monitoring tool for network devices
• Supports SNMP polling for data collection
• Customizable graphs and dashboards
• Threshold-based alerting
• Supports RRDTool for data storage
• Web-based interface
• Plugin architecture for extendibility

Pros & Cons Analysis

Centreon Enterprise Server

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• Highly customizable and extensible
• Large extension ecosystem and community support
• Supports monitoring of diverse environments and technologies
• Intuitive web interface for easy access and visibility
• Available as software or virtual appliance for quick deployment

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Complex setup and configuration
• Requires expertise to customize and extend
• Limited native support for some monitoring tools
• Does not include commercial support by default

Cacti

Pros

• Free and open source
• Easy to install and configure
• Wide range of supported devices
• Flexible and customizable
• Active community support

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Complex interface
• Manual configuration required
• Limited scalability
• No official support

Pricing Comparison

Centreon Enterprise Server

• Open Source
• Subscription-Based

Cacti

• Open Source