Ceph vs Seaweed FS

Struggling to choose between Ceph and Seaweed FS? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Ceph is a System & Hardware solution with tags like distributed, scalable, open-source, object-storage, block-storage, file-system.

It boasts features such as Distributed object storage, Block storage, Filesystem storage, Erasure coding, Replication, Self-healing, No single point of failure, Horizontal scalability and pros including Highly scalable, Fault tolerant, Open source, Works with commodity hardware, Unified storage platform, Active development community.

On the other hand, Seaweed FS is a File Management product tagged with opensource, distributed, file-storage, scaling, fast.

Its standout features include Distributed file system, Scalable and fast, Fault tolerant, Supports billions of files, Automatic replication, Streaming uploads and downloads, Namespace management, Caching, Erasure coding, Geo-replication, Access control, and it shines with pros like Highly scalable, Great performance, Fault tolerance, Geo-replication for global access, Efficient streaming, Open source with active community.

Feature	Ceph	Seaweed FS
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	System & Hardware	File Management

Product Overview

Ceph

Description: Ceph is an open source software storage platform that provides object, block, and file storage in a single unified system. It is designed for scalability and reliability using commodity hardware.

Seaweed FS

Description: SeaweedFS is an open-source, distributed file system designed for storing and serving billions of files fast. It spreads files over many servers, allowing for efficient scaling and parallel streaming of data.

Key Features Comparison

Ceph Features

• Distributed object storage
• Block storage
• Filesystem storage
• Erasure coding
• Replication
• Self-healing
• No single point of failure
• Horizontal scalability

Seaweed FS Features

• Distributed file system
• Scalable and fast
• Fault tolerant
• Supports billions of files
• Automatic replication
• Streaming uploads and downloads
• Namespace management
• Caching
• Erasure coding
• Geo-replication
• Access control

Pros & Cons Analysis

Ceph

Pros

• Highly scalable
• Fault tolerant
• Open source
• Works with commodity hardware
• Unified storage platform
• Active development community

Cons

• Complex to deploy and manage
• Steep learning curve
• Not as feature rich as some proprietary storage
• Limited enterprise support options

Seaweed FS

Pros

• Highly scalable
• Great performance
• Fault tolerance
• Geo-replication for global access
• Efficient streaming
• Open source with active community

Cons

• Limited user management features
• Steep learning curve
• Not beginner friendly
• Lacks GUI and management tools

Pricing Comparison

Ceph

• Open Source

Seaweed FS

• Open Source