ChmFox vs xchm

Struggling to choose between ChmFox and xchm? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

ChmFox is a Education & Reference solution with tags like chm, viewer, docs, reader, help-files.

It boasts features such as View CHM files, Search contents, Navigate table of contents, Add bookmarks and pros including Free and open source, Simple and easy to use, Good CHM file compatibility.

On the other hand, xchm is a Office & Productivity product tagged with chm, viewer, microsoft, compiled-html.

Its standout features include Table of contents pane, Text searching, Indexing, Ability to print pages, and it shines with pros like Open source, Easy to use, Good CHM file support, Available on Linux.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

ChmFox

ChmFox

ChmFox is a free, open source CHM file viewer for Windows. It provides a simple interface for reading .CHM documentation files, with features like search, bookmarks, and table of contents navigation.

Categories:
chm viewer docs reader help-files

ChmFox Features

  1. View CHM files
  2. Search contents
  3. Navigate table of contents
  4. Add bookmarks

Pricing

  • Free
  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Simple and easy to use

Good CHM file compatibility

Cons

Limited features compared to paid alternatives

Development seems inactive

Windows only


xchm

xchm

xchm is an open-source CHM file viewer for Linux. It allows users to easily view Microsoft Compiled HTML (.chm) documents. Some key features include a table of contents pane, text searching, indexing, and the ability to print pages.

Categories:
chm viewer microsoft compiled-html

Xchm Features

  1. Table of contents pane
  2. Text searching
  3. Indexing
  4. Ability to print pages

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source

Easy to use

Good CHM file support

Available on Linux

Cons

Limited features compared to proprietary options

Few customization options

No support for other file types