Cider Ci vs Earthly

Struggling to choose between Cider Ci and Earthly? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Cider Ci is a Development solution with tags like ios, macos, tvos, automation, testing, delivery.

It boasts features such as Native macOS application, GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket integration, Xcode workspace and project support, Incremental builds, Parallel testing, Code signing and distribution, Slack and Teams notifications and pros including Easy to set up and use, Free and open source, Fast builds and parallel testing, Great for iOS/macOS development teams.

On the other hand, Earthly is a Development product tagged with build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

Its standout features include Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support, and it shines with pros like Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

Feature	Cider Ci	Earthly
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Cider Ci

Description: Cider CI is an open-source continuous integration and delivery platform for iOS, macOS, and tvOS apps. It allows developers to automate building, testing, and distributing apps with every code change.

Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Key Features Comparison

Cider Ci Features

• Native macOS application
• GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket integration
• Xcode workspace and project support
• Incremental builds
• Parallel testing
• Code signing and distribution
• Slack and Teams notifications

Earthly Features

• Declarative build definitions
• Automatic caching and parallelization
• Built specifically for monorepos
• Integration with Docker containers
• Support for incremental builds
• Cross-platform support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Cider Ci

Pros

• Easy to set up and use
• Free and open source
• Fast builds and parallel testing
• Great for iOS/macOS development teams

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Not as feature rich as some paid solutions
• Lacks advanced configuration options

Earthly

Pros

• Fast and reproducible builds
• Simplifies build configuration
• Improves developer productivity
• Makes dependency management easier
• Good for large, complex projects

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Steep learning curve
• Less flexibility than general build tools
• Only supports Docker containers
• Mainly aimed at monorepos

Pricing Comparison

Cider Ci

• Open Source
• Free

Earthly

• Open Source