Cilium vs Apache APISIX

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Cilium icon
Cilium
Apache APISIX icon
Apache APISIX

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Cilium and Apache APISIX? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Cilium is a Network & Admin solution with tags like networking, containers, kubernetes, ebpf, xdp.

It boasts features such as eBPF-based networking, Identity-based security policies, Transparent encryption, Load balancing, Direct server return, Bandwidth manager, Observability and analytics and pros including High performance networking, Simple to operate, Native Kubernetes integration, Flexible security policies, Scalability.

On the other hand, Apache APISIX is a Network & Admin product tagged with apigateway, microservices, opensource, loadbalancing, authentication, ratelimiting.

Its standout features include Dynamic upstream routing, Dynamic load balancing, Plugin system, Customizable authentication, Granular access control, Real-time metrics, Distributed tracing, and it shines with pros like High performance, Flexible and extensible, Easy to deploy and configure, Open source and free, Active community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Cilium and Apache APISIX?

When evaluating Cilium versus Apache APISIX, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Cilium and Apache APISIX have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include networking, containers, kubernetes.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Cilium and Apache APISIX significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include networking, containers, kubernetes, ebpf.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include networking, containers and apigateway, microservices.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Cilium and Apache APISIX. You might also explore networking, containers, kubernetes for alternative approaches.

Feature Cilium Apache APISIX
Overall Score 1 N/A
Primary Category Network & Admin Network & Admin
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Cilium
Cilium

Description: Cilium is an open source software for providing and securing network connectivity between application services deployed using Linux container management platforms like Kubernetes. It uses eBPF/XDP for high performance container networking.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Apache APISIX
Apache APISIX

Description: Apache APISIX is an open-source, high-performance API gateway that helps organizations manage traffic to their APIs and microservices. It handles routing, load balancing, authentication, rate limiting and more.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Cilium
Cilium Features
  • eBPF-based networking
  • Identity-based security policies
  • Transparent encryption
  • Load balancing
  • Direct server return
  • Bandwidth manager
  • Observability and analytics
Apache APISIX
Apache APISIX Features
  • Dynamic upstream routing
  • Dynamic load balancing
  • Plugin system
  • Customizable authentication
  • Granular access control
  • Real-time metrics
  • Distributed tracing

Pros & Cons Analysis

Cilium
Cilium
Pros
  • High performance networking
  • Simple to operate
  • Native Kubernetes integration
  • Flexible security policies
  • Scalability
Cons
  • Complex architecture
  • Steep learning curve
  • Limited supported platforms
  • Immature technology
Apache APISIX
Apache APISIX
Pros
  • High performance
  • Flexible and extensible
  • Easy to deploy and configure
  • Open source and free
  • Active community support
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Requires expertise to manage and scale
  • Limited documentation and guides
  • Not many third-party integrations yet

Pricing Comparison

Cilium
Cilium
  • Open Source
Apache APISIX
Apache APISIX
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Cilium
Cilium
Cilium
Learn More About Cilium
Apache APISIX
Apache APISIX
Apache APISIX
Learn More About Apache APISIX

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Alternatives, made obvious.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal