Cimatron vs SprutCAM

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Cimatron icon
Cimatron
SprutCAM icon
SprutCAM

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Cimatron and SprutCAM? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Cimatron is a Manufacturing solution with tags like cad, cam, mold-design, die-design, tooling-design, 3d-modeling, machining, nc-programming.

It boasts features such as Hybrid modeling with both solid and surface capabilities, Electrode design and NC programming for EDM, 3-axis to 5-axis NC programming, Plastic parts design and machining, Sheet metal design and manufacturing, Tooling design for mold, die and fixture manufacturing and pros including Powerful CAD/CAM capabilities for tooling industry, Integrated solution from design to manufacture, Supports both solids and surfaces modeling.

On the other hand, SprutCAM is a Development product tagged with cad, cam, cnc, milling, turning, edm, plasma-cutting, nc-programming.

Its standout features include 2.5D milling, 3D milling, Turning, EDM, Plasma cutting, User-friendly interface, Tools for efficient NC programming, and it shines with pros like Wide range of supported operations, Good for complex 3D machining, Powerful simulation tools, Affordable pricing.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Cimatron and SprutCAM?

When evaluating Cimatron versus SprutCAM, both solutions serve different needs within the manufacturing ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Cimatron and SprutCAM have established themselves in the manufacturing market. Key areas include cad, cam, mold-design.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Cimatron and SprutCAM significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include cad, cam, mold-design, die-design.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include cad, cam and cad, cam.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Cimatron and SprutCAM. You might also explore cad, cam, mold-design for alternative approaches.

Feature Cimatron SprutCAM
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Manufacturing Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Cimatron
Cimatron

Description: Cimatron is a CAD/CAM software primarily used for designing and manufacturing molds, dies, and other tooling. It provides an integrated solution for mold, die and tool makers with features like hybrid modeling, electrode design, 3-axis to 5-axis NC programming, and more.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

SprutCAM
SprutCAM

Description: SprutCAM is a CAM software for creating CNC machine programs from CAD models. It is used for 2.5D milling, 3D milling, turning, EDM, and plasma cutting. It features a user-friendly interface and various tools for efficient NC programming.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Cimatron
Cimatron Features
  • Hybrid modeling with both solid and surface capabilities
  • Electrode design and NC programming for EDM
  • 3-axis to 5-axis NC programming
  • Plastic parts design and machining
  • Sheet metal design and manufacturing
  • Tooling design for mold, die and fixture manufacturing
SprutCAM
SprutCAM Features
  • 2.5D milling
  • 3D milling
  • Turning
  • EDM
  • Plasma cutting
  • User-friendly interface
  • Tools for efficient NC programming

Pros & Cons Analysis

Cimatron
Cimatron
Pros
  • Powerful CAD/CAM capabilities for tooling industry
  • Integrated solution from design to manufacture
  • Supports both solids and surfaces modeling
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Expensive compared to other CAD options
  • Limited use outside of mold, die and tooling industry
SprutCAM
SprutCAM
Pros
  • Wide range of supported operations
  • Good for complex 3D machining
  • Powerful simulation tools
  • Affordable pricing
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Limited support options
  • Not as popular as other CAM software

Pricing Comparison

Cimatron
Cimatron
  • One-time Purchase
  • Subscription-Based
SprutCAM
SprutCAM
  • One-time Purchase
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs