Claris FileMaker vs QuintaDB

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Claris FileMaker icon
Claris FileMaker
QuintaDB icon
QuintaDB

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Claris FileMaker and QuintaDB? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Claris FileMaker is a Office & Productivity solution with tags like database, custom-database, business-solutions, data-management, layouts, reports.

It boasts features such as Relational database, Custom forms and layouts, Scripting and calculations, Reporting and analysis, Data integration, Security and access controls, Mobile access, Cloud hosting and pros including Intuitive interface, Powerful customization, Cross-platform, Scalable, Good for non-technical users, Wide app ecosystem.

On the other hand, QuintaDB is a Development product tagged with timeseries, opensource, database, analytics, iot.

Its standout features include Time-series optimized, Columnar storage, Data compression, Query acceleration, High ingestion rates, Cloud native, and it shines with pros like Fast time-series queries, Low infrastructure costs, Easy to use, Open source.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Claris FileMaker and QuintaDB?

When evaluating Claris FileMaker versus QuintaDB, both solutions serve different needs within the office & productivity ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Claris FileMaker and QuintaDB have established themselves in the office & productivity market. Key areas include database, custom-database, business-solutions.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Claris FileMaker and QuintaDB significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include database, custom-database, business-solutions, data-management.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include database, custom-database and timeseries, opensource.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Claris FileMaker and QuintaDB. You might also explore database, custom-database, business-solutions for alternative approaches.

Feature Claris FileMaker QuintaDB
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Office & Productivity Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker

Description: Claris FileMaker is a cross-platform database application that allows users to easily create custom databases and build business solutions. It includes features for managing data, building layouts, and creating reports.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

QuintaDB
QuintaDB

Description: QuintaDB is an open-source database optimized for time-series data. It allows high-performance analytics while reducing infrastructure costs. QuintaDB handles time-series workloads such as IoT sensor data, DevOps monitoring, and real-time analytics.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker Features
  • Relational database
  • Custom forms and layouts
  • Scripting and calculations
  • Reporting and analysis
  • Data integration
  • Security and access controls
  • Mobile access
  • Cloud hosting
QuintaDB
QuintaDB Features
  • Time-series optimized
  • Columnar storage
  • Data compression
  • Query acceleration
  • High ingestion rates
  • Cloud native

Pros & Cons Analysis

Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker
Pros
  • Intuitive interface
  • Powerful customization
  • Cross-platform
  • Scalable
  • Good for non-technical users
  • Wide app ecosystem
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Expensive
  • Limited cloud features in lower tiers
  • Not a traditional programming language
QuintaDB
QuintaDB
Pros
  • Fast time-series queries
  • Low infrastructure costs
  • Easy to use
  • Open source
Cons
  • Limited to time-series data
  • Less mature than leading databases
  • Lacks some advanced features

Pricing Comparison

Claris FileMaker
Claris FileMaker
  • Subscription-Based
QuintaDB
QuintaDB
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs