CLISP vs CMU Common Lisp

Struggling to choose between CLISP and CMU Common Lisp? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CLISP is a Development solution with tags like common-lisp, lisp, programming-language.

It boasts features such as Common Lisp implementation, Portable, Open source, Good performance, Foreign function interface, Scripting facility, Multithreading support, Unicode support and pros including Free and open source, Portable across platforms, Good performance, Support for common Lisp features like multithreading, Active development community.

On the other hand, CMU Common Lisp is a Development product tagged with common-lisp, lisp, programming-language.

Its standout features include Native code compiler, Foreign function interface, Documentation generation tools, Garbage collection, Object-oriented programming support, Macro system, Debugging and profiling tools, and it shines with pros like High performance, Mature and stable, Good documentation, Active community support, Free and open source.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

CLISP

CLISP

CLISP is a free, portable, open-source implementation of the Common Lisp programming language. It offers good performance, a foreign function interface, a scripting facility, and support for multithreading and Unicode.

Categories:
Development Lisp
common-lisp lisp programming-language

CLISP Features

  1. Common Lisp implementation
  2. Portable
  3. Open source
  4. Good performance
  5. Foreign function interface
  6. Scripting facility
  7. Multithreading support
  8. Unicode support

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Portable across platforms

Good performance

Support for common Lisp features like multithreading

Active development community

Cons

Not as fast as commercial Common Lisp implementations

Limited debugging facilities

Documentation could be more extensive

CMU Common Lisp

CMU Common Lisp

CMU Common Lisp is an open source implementation of the Common Lisp programming language developed at Carnegie Mellon University. It features an optimizing native code compiler, a foreign function interface, and tools for generating documentation.

Categories:
Development Lisp
common-lisp lisp programming-language

CMU Common Lisp Features

  1. Native code compiler
  2. Foreign function interface
  3. Documentation generation tools
  4. Garbage collection
  5. Object-oriented programming support
  6. Macro system
  7. Debugging and profiling tools

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

High performance

Mature and stable

Good documentation

Active community support

Free and open source

Cons

Not as widely used as some other Lisps

Less libraries/packages than more popular Lisps

Older codebase

Limited platform support