CloudShark vs Arkime

Struggling to choose between CloudShark and Arkime? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CloudShark is a Network & Admin solution with tags like networking, packets, analysis, pcap, troubleshooting.

It boasts features such as Web-based interface for analyzing packet captures, Support for PCAP and PCAPNG file formats, Filtering and searching of packets, Extraction of files, images etc. from packet data, Statistical analysis e.g. top talkers, protocol breakdown, Annotation and commenting on packets, Sharing of packet captures and pros including Easy to use without installing any software, Collaboration features allow teams to analyze captures together, Scales to handle large capture files, Integrates with other cloud services like Dropbox, Can access captures from anywhere with an internet connection.

On the other hand, Arkime is a Network & Admin product tagged with network, traffic, analyzer, forensics.

Its standout features include Real-time packet capture, Web-based interface, Customizable dashboards, Alerting and reporting, Supports various data inputs, Scalable and distributed architecture, Plugin support for extensibility, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, High performance packet capture, Intuitive web UI, Powerful analysis and visualization, Flexible and extensible, Scales to monitor large networks.

Feature	CloudShark	Arkime
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

CloudShark

Description: CloudShark is a cloud-based network packet analyzer that allows users to upload packet capture files and analyze them using a web browser. It provides features like filtering, extraction, statistics, search, and sharing of PCAPs.

Arkime

Description: Arkime is an open-source network traffic analyzer that captures packets in real-time and enables users to search, analyze and visualize network traffic. It can handle high bandwidth with the ability to capture at rates up to 40 Gbps. Arkime provides a powerful interface for forensic analysis.

Key Features Comparison

CloudShark Features

• Web-based interface for analyzing packet captures
• Support for PCAP and PCAPNG file formats
• Filtering and searching of packets
• Extraction of files, images etc. from packet data
• Statistical analysis e.g. top talkers, protocol breakdown
• Annotation and commenting on packets
• Sharing of packet captures

Arkime Features

• Real-time packet capture
• Web-based interface
• Customizable dashboards
• Alerting and reporting
• Supports various data inputs
• Scalable and distributed architecture
• Plugin support for extensibility

Pros & Cons Analysis

CloudShark

Pros

• Easy to use without installing any software
• Collaboration features allow teams to analyze captures together
• Scales to handle large capture files
• Integrates with other cloud services like Dropbox
• Can access captures from anywhere with an internet connection

Cons

• Upload speeds can limit analyzing large captures
• Sensitive data is stored on external servers
• Advanced features may require paid plans
• Lacks some features of desktop packet analysis tools

Arkime

Pros

• Open source and free
• High performance packet capture
• Intuitive web UI
• Powerful analysis and visualization
• Flexible and extensible
• Scales to monitor large networks

Cons

• Complex initial setup
• Steep learning curve
• Requires dedicated hardware
• Limited support options

Pricing Comparison

CloudShark

• Freemium
• Subscription-Based

Arkime

• Open Source