CloudShark vs Termshark

Struggling to choose between CloudShark and Termshark? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CloudShark is a Network & Admin solution with tags like networking, packets, analysis, pcap, troubleshooting.

It boasts features such as Web-based interface for analyzing packet captures, Support for PCAP and PCAPNG file formats, Filtering and searching of packets, Extraction of files, images etc. from packet data, Statistical analysis e.g. top talkers, protocol breakdown, Annotation and commenting on packets, Sharing of packet captures and pros including Easy to use without installing any software, Collaboration features allow teams to analyze captures together, Scales to handle large capture files, Integrates with other cloud services like Dropbox, Can access captures from anywhere with an internet connection.

On the other hand, Termshark is a Network & Admin product tagged with terminal, network, protocol, analyzer, packets, cli.

Its standout features include Captures live packet data from network interfaces, Displays packets in a terminal user interface, Filters packets using display filters, Analyzes protocols including TCP, UDP, HTTP, DNS, and more, Supports common capture file formats like PCAP and PCAPNG, Runs natively in Linux terminal without a GUI, Built on top of TShark and Wireshark libraries, and it shines with pros like Lightweight terminal-based interface, No GUI overhead or dependencies, Works over SSH connections, Fast and responsive for analyzing live captures, Powerful display filters, Leverages Wireshark protocol analysis.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

CloudShark

CloudShark

CloudShark is a cloud-based network packet analyzer that allows users to upload packet capture files and analyze them using a web browser. It provides features like filtering, extraction, statistics, search, and sharing of PCAPs.

Categories:
networking packets analysis pcap troubleshooting

CloudShark Features

  1. Web-based interface for analyzing packet captures
  2. Support for PCAP and PCAPNG file formats
  3. Filtering and searching of packets
  4. Extraction of files, images etc. from packet data
  5. Statistical analysis e.g. top talkers, protocol breakdown
  6. Annotation and commenting on packets
  7. Sharing of packet captures

Pricing

  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Easy to use without installing any software

Collaboration features allow teams to analyze captures together

Scales to handle large capture files

Integrates with other cloud services like Dropbox

Can access captures from anywhere with an internet connection

Cons

Upload speeds can limit analyzing large captures

Sensitive data is stored on external servers

Advanced features may require paid plans

Lacks some features of desktop packet analysis tools


Termshark

Termshark

Termshark is a terminal based network protocol analyzer. It allows you to inspect network traffic and analyze packets, similar to Wireshark, but runs in a terminal instead of a graphical interface.

Categories:
terminal network protocol analyzer packets cli

Termshark Features

  1. Captures live packet data from network interfaces
  2. Displays packets in a terminal user interface
  3. Filters packets using display filters
  4. Analyzes protocols including TCP, UDP, HTTP, DNS, and more
  5. Supports common capture file formats like PCAP and PCAPNG
  6. Runs natively in Linux terminal without a GUI
  7. Built on top of TShark and Wireshark libraries

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Lightweight terminal-based interface

No GUI overhead or dependencies

Works over SSH connections

Fast and responsive for analyzing live captures

Powerful display filters

Leverages Wireshark protocol analysis

Cons

Less intuitive than GUI-based Wireshark

Steeper learning curve for terminal usage

Limited to keyboard-based interaction

Harder to visualize packet flows

No built-in statistical summaries