CMU Common Lisp vs Allegro CL

Struggling to choose between CMU Common Lisp and Allegro CL? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CMU Common Lisp is a Development solution with tags like common-lisp, lisp, programming-language.

It boasts features such as Native code compiler, Foreign function interface, Documentation generation tools, Garbage collection, Object-oriented programming support, Macro system, Debugging and profiling tools and pros including High performance, Mature and stable, Good documentation, Active community support, Free and open source.

On the other hand, Allegro CL is a Development product tagged with lisp, common-lisp, compiler, ide.

Its standout features include Optimizing compiler, Advanced debugging tools, Object-oriented programming extensions, Networking extensions, Extensive language extensions, and it shines with pros like High performance Common Lisp environment, Powerful compiler and debugging tools, Extensive language features and extensions.

Feature	CMU Common Lisp	Allegro CL
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

CMU Common Lisp

Description: CMU Common Lisp is an open source implementation of the Common Lisp programming language developed at Carnegie Mellon University. It features an optimizing native code compiler, a foreign function interface, and tools for generating documentation.

Allegro CL

Description: Allegro CL is a high performance Common Lisp programming language environment. It includes an optimizing compiler, advanced debugging tools, and extensive language extensions for areas like object-oriented programming, networking, and more.

Key Features Comparison

CMU Common Lisp Features

• Native code compiler
• Foreign function interface
• Documentation generation tools
• Garbage collection
• Object-oriented programming support
• Macro system
• Debugging and profiling tools

Allegro CL Features

• Optimizing compiler
• Advanced debugging tools
• Object-oriented programming extensions
• Networking extensions
• Extensive language extensions

Pros & Cons Analysis

CMU Common Lisp

Pros

• High performance
• Mature and stable
• Good documentation
• Active community support
• Free and open source

Cons

• Not as widely used as some other Lisps
• Less libraries/packages than more popular Lisps
• Older codebase
• Limited platform support

Allegro CL

Pros

• High performance Common Lisp environment
• Powerful compiler and debugging tools
• Extensive language features and extensions

Cons

• Steep learning curve for those unfamiliar with Lisp
• Limited community and ecosystem compared to more popular languages

Pricing Comparison

CMU Common Lisp

• Open Source

Allegro CL

• One-time Purchase