CockroachDB vs Hazelcast

Struggling to choose between CockroachDB and Hazelcast? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CockroachDB is a Development solution with tags like distributed, scalable, fault-tolerant, sql.

It boasts features such as Distributed SQL database, Horizontal scaling, High availability, Fault tolerance, ACID transactions, Multi-datacenter support, SQL compatibility, Automatic replication and failover, Geo-distributed deployments, Automated data balancing, SQL access for applications and pros including Scalable and highly available, Consistent and durable data, Automatic failover and recovery, SQL compatibility for easy migration, Open-source and community-driven, Cloud-native architecture.

On the other hand, Hazelcast is a Development product tagged with caching, processing-streams, clustering.

Its standout features include Distributed in-memory data store, Low latency data access, Automatic sharding and rebalancing, ACID transactions, Querying and aggregation, Event journaling, Multi-datacenter replication, Web session clustering, Continuous query, Machine learning, and it shines with pros like Fast performance, Easy scalability, High availability, Flexible deployment options, Open source, Rich ecosystem.

Feature	CockroachDB	Hazelcast
Overall Score	1	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

CockroachDB

Description: CockroachDB is an open-source, distributed SQL database that scales horizontally with high availability to tolerate failures and supports strongly consistent ACID transactions. It aims to provide scalability, survivability, and data consistency across multiple datacenters.

Hazelcast

Description: Hazelcast is an open source in-memory data grid that enables distribution of data and computation across servers for scalability, speed, and resilience. It is commonly used for caching, processing streams, and clustering.

Key Features Comparison

CockroachDB Features

• Distributed SQL database
• Horizontal scaling
• High availability
• Fault tolerance
• ACID transactions
• Multi-datacenter support
• SQL compatibility
• Automatic replication and failover
• Geo-distributed deployments
• Automated data balancing
• SQL access for applications

Hazelcast Features

• Distributed in-memory data store
• Low latency data access
• Automatic sharding and rebalancing
• ACID transactions
• Querying and aggregation
• Event journaling
• Multi-datacenter replication
• Web session clustering
• Continuous query
• Machine learning

Pros & Cons Analysis

CockroachDB

Pros

• Scalable and highly available
• Consistent and durable data
• Automatic failover and recovery
• SQL compatibility for easy migration
• Open-source and community-driven
• Cloud-native architecture

Cons

• Complexity of managing a distributed system
• Limited ecosystem and tooling compared to traditional databases
• Higher hardware requirements for production deployments
• Potential performance overhead due to distributed nature

Hazelcast

Pros

• Fast performance
• Easy scalability
• High availability
• Flexible deployment options
• Open source
• Rich ecosystem

Cons

• Complex configuration
• Steep learning curve
• No visual interface

Pricing Comparison

CockroachDB

• Open Source

Hazelcast

• Open Source
• Enterprise Edition (Subscription)