Codeception vs CrossBrowserTesting

Struggling to choose between Codeception and CrossBrowserTesting? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Codeception is a Development solution with tags like php, testing, tdd, bdd, acceptance-testing, unit-testing.

It boasts features such as Behavior Driven Development style tests, Unit testing, Integration testing, Acceptance testing, Functional testing, Supports multiple frameworks like Laravel, Symfony, Yii, Phalcon, Zend Framework, Command line interface, HTML reports and code coverage, Page object models, Parallel execution, Database interaction testing, REST API testing, Mocking and stubbing, Cross-browser testing and pros including Supports multiple test types, Active community and documentation, Integration with popular PHP frameworks, Easy to learn and use, Good for TDD and BDD, Customizable and extensible.

On the other hand, CrossBrowserTesting is a Online Services product tagged with crossbrowser-testing, web-application-testing, browser-compatibility, responsive-testing.

Its standout features include Test website on 2000+ real browsers and devices, Automatic screenshots and videos, Visual bug reporting, JavaScript Error logging, Page speed insights, Accessibility testing, Geolocation testing, Network throttling, Automated testing with Selenium, and it shines with pros like Saves time compared to manual testing, Wide range of browsers and devices, Easy to use interface, Good for responsive design testing, Integrates with popular tools like Selenium.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Codeception

Codeception

Codeception is an open-source PHP testing framework that allows you to write acceptance, functional, integration, and unit tests for your web applications. It provides an intuitive interface and powerful tools to make testing PHP applications easier and faster.

Categories:
Development Testing
php testing tdd bdd acceptance-testing unit-testing

Codeception Features

  1. Behavior Driven Development style tests
  2. Unit testing
  3. Integration testing
  4. Acceptance testing
  5. Functional testing
  6. Supports multiple frameworks like Laravel, Symfony, Yii, Phalcon, Zend Framework
  7. Command line interface
  8. HTML reports and code coverage
  9. Page object models
  10. Parallel execution
  11. Database interaction testing
  12. REST API testing
  13. Mocking and stubbing
  14. Cross-browser testing

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Supports multiple test types

Active community and documentation

Integration with popular PHP frameworks

Easy to learn and use

Good for TDD and BDD

Customizable and extensible

Cons

Steep learning curve for beginners

Limited built-in assertions

No native support for JavaScript testing

Integration with some frameworks can be tricky

May require more configuration than simpler frameworks

CrossBrowserTesting

CrossBrowserTesting

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud-based web application testing tool that allows users to test their websites and web apps across various browsers, operating systems and devices. It aims to provide comprehensive cross-browser compatibility testing.

Categories:
Online Services Web Testing
crossbrowser-testing web-application-testing browser-compatibility responsive-testing

CrossBrowserTesting Features

  1. Test website on 2000+ real browsers and devices
  2. Automatic screenshots and videos
  3. Visual bug reporting
  4. JavaScript Error logging
  5. Page speed insights
  6. Accessibility testing
  7. Geolocation testing
  8. Network throttling
  9. Automated testing with Selenium

Pricing

  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Saves time compared to manual testing

Wide range of browsers and devices

Easy to use interface

Good for responsive design testing

Integrates with popular tools like Selenium

Cons

Can get expensive for large test suites

Limited mobile testing features

No end-to-end user journey testing

Not ideal for complex web apps