Codeception vs Retest

Struggling to choose between Codeception and Retest? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Codeception is a Development solution with tags like php, testing, tdd, bdd, acceptance-testing, unit-testing.

It boasts features such as Behavior Driven Development style tests, Unit testing, Integration testing, Acceptance testing, Functional testing, Supports multiple frameworks like Laravel, Symfony, Yii, Phalcon, Zend Framework, Command line interface, HTML reports and code coverage, Page object models, Parallel execution, Database interaction testing, REST API testing, Mocking and stubbing, Cross-browser testing and pros including Supports multiple test types, Active community and documentation, Integration with popular PHP frameworks, Easy to learn and use, Good for TDD and BDD, Customizable and extensible.

On the other hand, Retest is a Development product tagged with test-automation, regression-testing, web-testing, mobile-testing, crossbrowser-testing, open-source.

Its standout features include Record and playback tests, Cross-browser testing, Mobile testing, Visual regression testing, CI/CD integration, Test maintenance and debugging, Open source and self-hosted, and it shines with pros like Easy to use recorder, Supports many browsers and devices, Visual testing for UI changes, Active open source community, Self-hosted option available.

Feature	Codeception	Retest
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Codeception

Description: Codeception is an open-source PHP testing framework that allows you to write acceptance, functional, integration, and unit tests for your web applications. It provides an intuitive interface and powerful tools to make testing PHP applications easier and faster.

Retest

Description: Retest is an open-source test automation tool for regression testing web and mobile applications. It supports multiple browsers and devices for cross-browser testing and provides easy test recording, editing, maintenance and debugging.

Key Features Comparison

Codeception Features

• Behavior Driven Development style tests
• Unit testing
• Integration testing
• Acceptance testing
• Functional testing
• Supports multiple frameworks like Laravel, Symfony, Yii, Phalcon, Zend Framework
• Command line interface
• HTML reports and code coverage
• Page object models
• Parallel execution
• Database interaction testing
• REST API testing
• Mocking and stubbing
• Cross-browser testing

Retest Features

• Record and playback tests
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile testing
• Visual regression testing
• CI/CD integration
• Test maintenance and debugging
• Open source and self-hosted

Pros & Cons Analysis

Codeception

Pros

• Supports multiple test types
• Active community and documentation
• Integration with popular PHP frameworks
• Easy to learn and use
• Good for TDD and BDD
• Customizable and extensible

Cons

• Steep learning curve for beginners
• Limited built-in assertions
• No native support for JavaScript testing
• Integration with some frameworks can be tricky
• May require more configuration than simpler frameworks

Retest

Pros

• Easy to use recorder
• Supports many browsers and devices
• Visual testing for UI changes
• Active open source community
• Self-hosted option available

Cons

• Limited built-in reporting
• Steep learning curve for advanced scripting
• Mobile testing requires emulator/simulator
• Lacks some enterprise-level features

Pricing Comparison

Codeception

• Open Source

Retest

• Free
• Open Source