Confluence vs Fulcrum Wiki

Struggling to choose between Confluence and Fulcrum Wiki? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Confluence is a Office & Productivity solution with tags like wiki, collaboration, project-management.

It boasts features such as Wiki pages for documentation, Rich text editor for formatting content, Permissions to restrict access, Comments and mentions, Attachments and file management, Search and navigation, Templates and blueprints, Integrations with other tools and pros including Intuitive and easy to use interface, Powerful content creation and formatting, Robust permissions and access controls, Seamless collaboration capabilities, Extensive customization options, Scales to large teams and enterprises, Great integration ecosystem.

On the other hand, Fulcrum Wiki is a Office & Productivity product tagged with open-source, selfhosted, wiki, version-control, page-history, wysiwyg-editing, access-controls, media-management, collaboration, knowledge-sharing.

Its standout features include WYSIWYG editor, Version control, Access controls, Media management, Page history, Collaboration tools, and it shines with pros like Open source, Self-hosted, Good collaboration features, Version control helps track changes, Access controls allow managing permissions.

Feature	Confluence	Fulcrum Wiki
Overall Score	1	N/A
Primary Category	Office & Productivity	Office & Productivity

Product Overview

Confluence

Description: Confluence is a popular wiki and collaboration software developed by Atlassian. It allows teams to efficiently collaborate on documents and projects in a central place.

Fulcrum Wiki

Description: Fulcrum Wiki is an open source, self-hosted wiki software. It includes features such as version control, page history, WYSIWYG editing, access controls, and media management. Fulcrum Wiki allows teams to easily collaborate on content and knowledge sharing.

Key Features Comparison

Confluence Features

• Wiki pages for documentation
• Rich text editor for formatting content
• Permissions to restrict access
• Comments and mentions
• Attachments and file management
• Search and navigation
• Templates and blueprints
• Integrations with other tools

Fulcrum Wiki Features

• WYSIWYG editor
• Version control
• Access controls
• Media management
• Page history
• Collaboration tools

Pros & Cons Analysis

Confluence

Pros

• Intuitive and easy to use interface
• Powerful content creation and formatting
• Robust permissions and access controls
• Seamless collaboration capabilities
• Extensive customization options
• Scales to large teams and enterprises
• Great integration ecosystem

Cons

• Can be expensive for larger teams
• Steep learning curve for advanced features
• Formatting options not as extensive as full word processor
• Limited workflows and process automation
• Mobile apps lack some functionality
• Can be slow with very large wikis

Fulcrum Wiki

Pros

• Open source
• Self-hosted
• Good collaboration features
• Version control helps track changes
• Access controls allow managing permissions

Cons

• Limited integrations compared to hosted wikis
• Requires self-hosting infrastructure
• Not as user-friendly as some commercial wikis

Pricing Comparison

Confluence

• Freemium
• Subscription-Based

Fulcrum Wiki

• Open Source