Consul by HashiCorp vs Apache ZooKeeper

Struggling to choose between Consul by HashiCorp and Apache ZooKeeper? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Consul by HashiCorp is a Network & Admin solution with tags like service-discovery, health-checking, segmentation, configuration, open-source.

It boasts features such as Service Discovery, Health Checking, Key/Value Store, Multi-Datacenter, Segmentation and pros including Open source with commercial support available, Multi-platform and cloud agnostic, Large and active community, Powerful API for integration and automation.

On the other hand, Apache ZooKeeper is a Development product tagged with coordination, distributed-systems, configuration-management, naming-service, synchronization, group-services.

Its standout features include Distributed coordination, Synchronization, Configuration management, Naming registry, and it shines with pros like Highly reliable and available, Simple API, Built-in leader election, Watches for changes.

Feature	Consul by HashiCorp	Apache ZooKeeper
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Development

Product Overview

Consul by HashiCorp

Description: Consul by HashiCorp is an open-source service networking solution that provides service discovery, health checking, segmentation, and configuration across infrastructure. It is commonly used for connecting and securing services across any runtime platform and public or private cloud.

Apache ZooKeeper

Description: Apache ZooKeeper is an open-source coordination service for distributed applications. It helps coordinate large distributed systems by providing services like naming, configuration management, synchronization, and group services.

Key Features Comparison

Consul by HashiCorp Features

• Service Discovery
• Health Checking
• Key/Value Store
• Multi-Datacenter
• Segmentation

Apache ZooKeeper Features

• Distributed coordination
• Synchronization
• Configuration management
• Naming registry

Pros & Cons Analysis

Consul by HashiCorp

Pros

• Open source with commercial support available
• Multi-platform and cloud agnostic
• Large and active community
• Powerful API for integration and automation

Cons

• Complex installation and configuration
• Steep learning curve
• No built-in monitoring or analytics
• Limited UI for management

Apache ZooKeeper

Pros

• Highly reliable and available
• Simple API
• Built-in leader election
• Watches for changes

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Not suitable for large data storage
• No authentication by default
• Manual recovery procedures

Pricing Comparison

Consul by HashiCorp

• Open Source
• Enterprise

Apache ZooKeeper

• Open Source