CrossBrowserTesting vs Retest

Struggling to choose between CrossBrowserTesting and Retest? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CrossBrowserTesting is a Online Services solution with tags like crossbrowser-testing, web-application-testing, browser-compatibility, responsive-testing.

It boasts features such as Test website on 2000+ real browsers and devices, Automatic screenshots and videos, Visual bug reporting, JavaScript Error logging, Page speed insights, Accessibility testing, Geolocation testing, Network throttling, Automated testing with Selenium and pros including Saves time compared to manual testing, Wide range of browsers and devices, Easy to use interface, Good for responsive design testing, Integrates with popular tools like Selenium.

On the other hand, Retest is a Development product tagged with test-automation, regression-testing, web-testing, mobile-testing, crossbrowser-testing, open-source.

Its standout features include Record and playback tests, Cross-browser testing, Mobile testing, Visual regression testing, CI/CD integration, Test maintenance and debugging, Open source and self-hosted, and it shines with pros like Easy to use recorder, Supports many browsers and devices, Visual testing for UI changes, Active open source community, Self-hosted option available.

Feature	CrossBrowserTesting	Retest
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Online Services	Development

Product Overview

CrossBrowserTesting

Description: CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud-based web application testing tool that allows users to test their websites and web apps across various browsers, operating systems and devices. It aims to provide comprehensive cross-browser compatibility testing.

Retest

Description: Retest is an open-source test automation tool for regression testing web and mobile applications. It supports multiple browsers and devices for cross-browser testing and provides easy test recording, editing, maintenance and debugging.

Key Features Comparison

CrossBrowserTesting Features

• Test website on 2000+ real browsers and devices
• Automatic screenshots and videos
• Visual bug reporting
• JavaScript Error logging
• Page speed insights
• Accessibility testing
• Geolocation testing
• Network throttling
• Automated testing with Selenium

Retest Features

• Record and playback tests
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile testing
• Visual regression testing
• CI/CD integration
• Test maintenance and debugging
• Open source and self-hosted

Pros & Cons Analysis

CrossBrowserTesting

Pros

• Saves time compared to manual testing
• Wide range of browsers and devices
• Easy to use interface
• Good for responsive design testing
• Integrates with popular tools like Selenium

Cons

• Can get expensive for large test suites
• Limited mobile testing features
• No end-to-end user journey testing
• Not ideal for complex web apps

Retest

Pros

• Easy to use recorder
• Supports many browsers and devices
• Visual testing for UI changes
• Active open source community
• Self-hosted option available

Cons

• Limited built-in reporting
• Steep learning curve for advanced scripting
• Mobile testing requires emulator/simulator
• Lacks some enterprise-level features

Pricing Comparison

CrossBrowserTesting

• Subscription-Based

Retest

• Free
• Open Source