CrossBrowserTesting vs testling

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

CrossBrowserTesting icon
CrossBrowserTesting
testling icon
testling

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between CrossBrowserTesting and testling? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CrossBrowserTesting is a Online Services solution with tags like crossbrowser-testing, web-application-testing, browser-compatibility, responsive-testing.

It boasts features such as Test website on 2000+ real browsers and devices, Automatic screenshots and videos, Visual bug reporting, JavaScript Error logging, Page speed insights, Accessibility testing, Geolocation testing, Network throttling, Automated testing with Selenium and pros including Saves time compared to manual testing, Wide range of browsers and devices, Easy to use interface, Good for responsive design testing, Integrates with popular tools like Selenium.

On the other hand, testling is a Development product tagged with testing, unit-testing, javascript.

Its standout features include Runs JavaScript unit tests in multiple browsers, Integrates with popular JavaScript unit testing frameworks like QUnit, Mocha, and Jasmine, Provides a web-based interface for running and monitoring tests, Supports real-time test reporting and results, Allows for remote testing on various devices and platforms, Provides a command-line interface for integrating with build processes, and it shines with pros like Simplifies the process of running JavaScript unit tests across different browsers, Enables efficient testing of web applications and libraries, Integrates with popular testing frameworks for seamless integration, Offers a user-friendly web-based interface for monitoring test results, Supports remote testing on a variety of devices and platforms.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare CrossBrowserTesting and testling?

When evaluating CrossBrowserTesting versus testling, both solutions serve different needs within the online services ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

CrossBrowserTesting and testling have established themselves in the online services market. Key areas include crossbrowser-testing, web-application-testing, browser-compatibility.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between CrossBrowserTesting and testling significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include crossbrowser-testing, web-application-testing, browser-compatibility, responsive-testing.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include crossbrowser-testing, web-application-testing and testing, unit-testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between CrossBrowserTesting and testling. You might also explore crossbrowser-testing, web-application-testing, browser-compatibility for alternative approaches.

Feature CrossBrowserTesting testling
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Online Services Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

CrossBrowserTesting
CrossBrowserTesting

Description: CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud-based web application testing tool that allows users to test their websites and web apps across various browsers, operating systems and devices. It aims to provide comprehensive cross-browser compatibility testing.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

testling
testling

Description: Testling is an online test runner that allows you to easily run JavaScript unit tests in multiple browsers. It integrates with popular JavaScript unit testing frameworks like QUnit, Mocha and Jasmine.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

CrossBrowserTesting
CrossBrowserTesting Features
  • Test website on 2000+ real browsers and devices
  • Automatic screenshots and videos
  • Visual bug reporting
  • JavaScript Error logging
  • Page speed insights
  • Accessibility testing
  • Geolocation testing
  • Network throttling
  • Automated testing with Selenium
testling
testling Features
  • Runs JavaScript unit tests in multiple browsers
  • Integrates with popular JavaScript unit testing frameworks like QUnit, Mocha, and Jasmine
  • Provides a web-based interface for running and monitoring tests
  • Supports real-time test reporting and results
  • Allows for remote testing on various devices and platforms
  • Provides a command-line interface for integrating with build processes

Pros & Cons Analysis

CrossBrowserTesting
CrossBrowserTesting
Pros
  • Saves time compared to manual testing
  • Wide range of browsers and devices
  • Easy to use interface
  • Good for responsive design testing
  • Integrates with popular tools like Selenium
Cons
  • Can get expensive for large test suites
  • Limited mobile testing features
  • No end-to-end user journey testing
  • Not ideal for complex web apps
testling
testling
Pros
  • Simplifies the process of running JavaScript unit tests across different browsers
  • Enables efficient testing of web applications and libraries
  • Integrates with popular testing frameworks for seamless integration
  • Offers a user-friendly web-based interface for monitoring test results
  • Supports remote testing on a variety of devices and platforms
Cons
  • Limited to JavaScript unit testing, may not cover all testing needs
  • Requires a stable internet connection for remote testing
  • May have limited customization options compared to self-hosted solutions
  • Potential performance issues for large test suites or complex applications

Pricing Comparison

CrossBrowserTesting
CrossBrowserTesting
  • Subscription-Based
testling
testling
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs