CruiseControl.Net vs JetBrains TeamCity

Struggling to choose between CruiseControl.Net and JetBrains TeamCity? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CruiseControl.Net is a Development solution with tags like build, test, automation, integration, open-source.

It boasts features such as Automated build process, Integration with source control tools like SVN and Git, Customizable build triggers, Configurable notifications for build status, Web dashboard, Plugins for additional functionality, Works with various languages and frameworks like .NET, Java, Ruby, etc. and pros including Free and open source, Easy to set up and configure, Active community support, Highly customizable and extensible, Integrates well with CI/CD workflows, Web UI provides overview of build status.

On the other hand, JetBrains TeamCity is a Development product tagged with build-automation, testing, deployment, integration, delivery.

Its standout features include Continuous Integration, Build Automation, Test Automation, Deployment Automation, Build Agent Management, Build Configuration Templates, Build Chaining, REST API, Git, SVN, Mercurial Support, and it shines with pros like Powerful build customization, Many integrations, Parallel testing, Agent auto-scaling, Template reuse, Chained deployments, REST API for automation, Supports major VCS tools.

Feature	CruiseControl.Net	JetBrains TeamCity
Overall Score	N/A	1
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

CruiseControl.Net

Description: CruiseControl.Net is an open source continuous integration server for developers. It allows you to automatically build projects, run tests, and report on build status. CruiseControl.Net integrates with solutions like NAnt, Visual Studio, and SVN.

JetBrains TeamCity

Description: JetBrains TeamCity is a continuous integration and delivery server that helps developers automate building, testing, and deploying applications. It provides customizable build configurations, integrations with various tools, parallel testing, and deployment automation.

Key Features Comparison

CruiseControl.Net Features

• Automated build process
• Integration with source control tools like SVN and Git
• Customizable build triggers
• Configurable notifications for build status
• Web dashboard
• Plugins for additional functionality
• Works with various languages and frameworks like .NET, Java, Ruby, etc.

JetBrains TeamCity Features

• Continuous Integration
• Build Automation
• Test Automation
• Deployment Automation
• Build Agent Management
• Build Configuration Templates
• Build Chaining
• REST API
• Git, SVN, Mercurial Support

Pros & Cons Analysis

CruiseControl.Net

Pros

• Free and open source
• Easy to set up and configure
• Active community support
• Highly customizable and extensible
• Integrates well with CI/CD workflows
• Web UI provides overview of build status

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Setup can be complex for larger projects
• Limited native support for some languages/platforms
• Web UI is basic and lacks some advanced features

JetBrains TeamCity

Pros

• Powerful build customization
• Many integrations
• Parallel testing
• Agent auto-scaling
• Template reuse
• Chained deployments
• REST API for automation
• Supports major VCS tools

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Complex UI
• Resource intensive
• Limited free version
• Vendor lock-in

Pricing Comparison

CruiseControl.Net

• Open Source

JetBrains TeamCity

• Free
• Subscription-Based