CrystalMQ vs HiveMQ

Struggling to choose between CrystalMQ and HiveMQ? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

CrystalMQ is a Network & Admin solution with tags like messaging, queueing, distributed-systems.

It boasts features such as Open source and free, Supports a variety of messaging protocols like AMQP, MQTT, STOMP, High performance and low latency, Horizontally scalable through sharding, Persistence using Redis or PostgreSQL, Supports clustering for high availability, Plugin architecture for extendibility, Admin dashboard and REST API for management and pros including Lightweight and fast compared to many commercial MQ servers, Very scalable for high throughput needs, Supports many developer-friendly protocols out of the box, Easy to deploy, manage, and monitor, Open source with active community support.

On the other hand, HiveMQ is a Network & Admin product tagged with mqtt, messaging, iot, broker, open-source.

Its standout features include MQTT v3.1.1 and v5.0 compliant, Persistent sessions, Topic wildcards, SSL/TLS encryption, Access control lists, Clustering and high availability, Plugin system, REST API, Websockets, and it shines with pros like Open source, Scalable and performant, Enterprise-grade features, Well-documented, Active community support.

Feature	CrystalMQ	HiveMQ
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

CrystalMQ

Description: CrystalMQ is an open-source message queuing software that enables asynchronous message-based communication between distributed applications. It is lightweight, fast, and scalable.

HiveMQ

Description: HiveMQ is an open source MQTT messaging broker that enables connecting IoT devices to the cloud. It supports features like persistent sessions, security, scaling, and more. HiveMQ aims to provide enterprise-grade MQTT messaging infrastructure.

Key Features Comparison

CrystalMQ Features

• Open source and free
• Supports a variety of messaging protocols like AMQP, MQTT, STOMP
• High performance and low latency
• Horizontally scalable through sharding
• Persistence using Redis or PostgreSQL
• Supports clustering for high availability
• Plugin architecture for extendibility
• Admin dashboard and REST API for management

HiveMQ Features

• MQTT v3.1.1 and v5.0 compliant
• Persistent sessions
• Topic wildcards
• SSL/TLS encryption
• Access control lists
• Clustering and high availability
• Plugin system
• REST API
• Websockets

Pros & Cons Analysis

CrystalMQ

Pros

• Lightweight and fast compared to many commercial MQ servers
• Very scalable for high throughput needs
• Supports many developer-friendly protocols out of the box
• Easy to deploy, manage, and monitor
• Open source with active community support

Cons

• Lacks some advanced features of commercial MQ servers
• Limited documentation and examples
• Not ideal for complex routing logic
• UI is basic compared to some alternatives

HiveMQ

Pros

• Open source
• Scalable and performant
• Enterprise-grade features
• Well-documented
• Active community support

Cons

• Limited user management capabilities
• No out-of-the-box analytics
• Steep learning curve for advanced features

Pricing Comparison

CrystalMQ

• Open Source

HiveMQ

• Open Source
• Enterprise