cURL vs HttpMaster

Struggling to choose between cURL and HttpMaster? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

cURL is a Development solution with tags like networking, apis, automation.

It boasts features such as Command line tool for transferring data with URLs, Supports many common protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, FTPS, SFTP, SMTP, POP3, IMAP, LDAP, Can send and receive data including files, HTTP POST data, HTTPS requests, etc, Rich set of options for authentication, cookies, headers, proxies, SSL certificates, and more, Can output response data to stdout or save to file, Scriptable and automatable, Cross-platform - works on Linux, Windows, macOS, etc and pros including Free and open source, Powerful and feature rich, Easy to use for basic requests, Highly scriptable for advanced automation, Pre-installed on most systems, Great for testing APIs and web scraping.

On the other hand, HttpMaster is a Development product tagged with http, client, testing, automation.

Its standout features include Graphical user interface for easy use, Make HTTP/HTTPS requests, Inspect server responses, Measure page load times, Automate tests with scripts, Export request and response data, Manipulate requests, Authentication support, Proxy support, and it shines with pros like Intuitive and easy to use, Powerful features for testing and debugging APIs, Good performance measurement capabilities, Automation enables continuous testing, Exports allow further analysis of data, Actively developed and maintained.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

cURL

cURL

cURL is a command line tool that allows you to make network requests like GET and POST to transfer data or interact with web APIs and servers. It supports common internet protocols like HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and more. cURL is useful for testing APIs, web scraping, and automating interactions with web services.

Categories:
networking apis automation

CURL Features

  1. Command line tool for transferring data with URLs
  2. Supports many common protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, FTPS, SFTP, SMTP, POP3, IMAP, LDAP
  3. Can send and receive data including files, HTTP POST data, HTTPS requests, etc
  4. Rich set of options for authentication, cookies, headers, proxies, SSL certificates, and more
  5. Can output response data to stdout or save to file
  6. Scriptable and automatable
  7. Cross-platform - works on Linux, Windows, macOS, etc

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Powerful and feature rich

Easy to use for basic requests

Highly scriptable for advanced automation

Pre-installed on most systems

Great for testing APIs and web scraping

Cons

Command line only (no GUI)

Steep learning curve for advanced features

Difficult to debug compared to GUI apps

Not as user friendly as browser apps like Postman


HttpMaster

HttpMaster

HttpMaster is an HTTP client and web testing tool that allows you to make HTTP requests, inspect responses, measure performance, automate tests, manipulate requests, export data, and more. It has an intuitive graphical user interface and aims to simplify web testing and API testing.

Categories:
http client testing automation

HttpMaster Features

  1. Graphical user interface for easy use
  2. Make HTTP/HTTPS requests
  3. Inspect server responses
  4. Measure page load times
  5. Automate tests with scripts
  6. Export request and response data
  7. Manipulate requests
  8. Authentication support
  9. Proxy support

Pricing

  • Free
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Intuitive and easy to use

Powerful features for testing and debugging APIs

Good performance measurement capabilities

Automation enables continuous testing

Exports allow further analysis of data

Actively developed and maintained

Cons

Less customizable than developer-focused tools

Scripting requires JavaScript knowledge

Lacks advanced authentication mechanisms

No built-in reporting capabilities