Cyberark vs Ekran System

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Cyberark icon
Cyberark
Ekran System icon
Ekran System

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Cyberark and Ekran System? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Cyberark is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like privileged-access-management, pam, access-control, credentials-management.

It boasts features such as Centralized privileged credential and secrets vault, Least privilege access controls, Session monitoring and recording, Privileged threat analytics, Automated password rotation, Integrations with IT systems and applications and pros including Comprehensive privileged access management, Granular access controls and policies, Detailed monitoring and reporting, Helps meet compliance requirements, Automates password and secrets management, Scalable to large enterprises.

On the other hand, Ekran System is a Business & Commerce product tagged with opensource, integration, workflow, automation, analytics.

Its standout features include Open-source workflow automation platform, Robust enterprise application integration, Connects APIs, databases, apps, files, queues, ERPs, Drag-and-drop workflow designer, Centralized monitoring and analytics, High availability and scalability, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Great flexibility in workflow design, Integrates many different systems and technologies, Powerful monitoring and analytics, Highly scalable and reliable.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Cyberark and Ekran System?

When evaluating Cyberark versus Ekran System, both solutions serve different needs within the security & privacy ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Cyberark and Ekran System have established themselves in the security & privacy market. Key areas include privileged-access-management, pam, access-control.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Cyberark and Ekran System significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include privileged-access-management, pam, access-control, credentials-management.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include privileged-access-management, pam and opensource, integration.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Cyberark and Ekran System. You might also explore privileged-access-management, pam, access-control for alternative approaches.

Feature Cyberark Ekran System
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Security & Privacy Business & Commerce
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Cyberark
Cyberark

Description: Cyberark is a privileged access management (PAM) solution that helps secure, control, manage, and monitor access to sensitive data and accounts. It provides visibility and control over privileged access across organizational assets.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Ekran System
Ekran System

Description: Ekran System is an open-source workflow automation and robust enterprise integration platform. It provides easy integration of various systems, flexible workflow design, monitoring and analytics.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Cyberark
Cyberark Features
  • Centralized privileged credential and secrets vault
  • Least privilege access controls
  • Session monitoring and recording
  • Privileged threat analytics
  • Automated password rotation
  • Integrations with IT systems and applications
Ekran System
Ekran System Features
  • Open-source workflow automation platform
  • Robust enterprise application integration
  • Connects APIs, databases, apps, files, queues, ERPs
  • Drag-and-drop workflow designer
  • Centralized monitoring and analytics
  • High availability and scalability

Pros & Cons Analysis

Cyberark
Cyberark
Pros
  • Comprehensive privileged access management
  • Granular access controls and policies
  • Detailed monitoring and reporting
  • Helps meet compliance requirements
  • Automates password and secrets management
  • Scalable to large enterprises
Cons
  • Complex deployment and configuration
  • Steep learning curve
  • Can be expensive for smaller companies
  • May require changes to processes and workflows
  • Ongoing maintenance and management overhead
Ekran System
Ekran System
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Great flexibility in workflow design
  • Integrates many different systems and technologies
  • Powerful monitoring and analytics
  • Highly scalable and reliable
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Limited documentation and support
  • Not as user friendly as some commercial options
  • Requires more technical expertise to set up and manage

Pricing Comparison

Cyberark
Cyberark
  • Subscription-Based
  • Pay-As-You-Go
  • Custom Pricing
Ekran System
Ekran System
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs