Earthly vs Agola

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Earthly icon
Earthly
Agola icon
Agola

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Earthly and Agola? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Earthly is a Development solution with tags like build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

It boasts features such as Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support and pros including Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

On the other hand, Agola is a Development product tagged with automation, build, test, deploy, release, pipeline, caching, artifact-management, configuration-as-code.

Its standout features include Configuration as code, Built-in caching, Artifact management, Integrations with various tools, Automated build pipelines, Automated testing, Automated deployments, Automated releases, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Easy to configure pipelines as code, Good performance with built-in caching, Integrates well with many tools, Automates and simplifies software workflows.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Earthly and Agola?

When evaluating Earthly versus Agola, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Earthly and Agola have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include build, automation, monorepo.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Earthly and Agola significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include build, automation, monorepo, caching.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include build, automation and automation, build.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Earthly and Agola. You might also explore build, automation, monorepo for alternative approaches.

Feature Earthly Agola
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Earthly
Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Agola
Agola

Description: Agola is an open-source platform for automating software development workflows. It allows you to define pipelines to build, test, deploy, and release your software projects. Key features include configuration as code, built-in caching, artifact management, and integrations with various tools.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Earthly
Earthly Features
  • Declarative build definitions
  • Automatic caching and parallelization
  • Built specifically for monorepos
  • Integration with Docker containers
  • Support for incremental builds
  • Cross-platform support
Agola
Agola Features
  • Configuration as code
  • Built-in caching
  • Artifact management
  • Integrations with various tools
  • Automated build pipelines
  • Automated testing
  • Automated deployments
  • Automated releases

Pros & Cons Analysis

Earthly
Earthly
Pros
  • Fast and reproducible builds
  • Simplifies build configuration
  • Improves developer productivity
  • Makes dependency management easier
  • Good for large, complex projects
Cons
  • Limited adoption so far
  • Steep learning curve
  • Less flexibility than general build tools
  • Only supports Docker containers
  • Mainly aimed at monorepos
Agola
Agola
Pros
  • Open source and free
  • Easy to configure pipelines as code
  • Good performance with built-in caching
  • Integrates well with many tools
  • Automates and simplifies software workflows
Cons
  • Limited documentation
  • Steep learning curve
  • Not as feature rich as some commercial options

Pricing Comparison

Earthly
Earthly
  • Open Source
Agola
Agola
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Earthly
Earthly
Earthly
Learn More About Earthly
Agola
Agola
Agola
Learn More About Agola

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Find what fits. Forget the rest.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal