Earthly vs CircleCI

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Earthly icon
Earthly
CircleCI icon
CircleCI

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Earthly and CircleCI? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Earthly is a Development solution with tags like build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

It boasts features such as Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support and pros including Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

On the other hand, CircleCI is a Development product tagged with cicd, testing, deployment, automation, analytics, monitoring.

Its standout features include Cloud-based CI/CD platform, Supports multiple languages and frameworks, Parallel test splitting, Configurable workflows, Artifact storage, Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, etc., and it shines with pros like Easy setup and configuration, Fast build times, Scalable infrastructure, Detailed build logs and insights, Flexible pricing options.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Earthly and CircleCI?

When evaluating Earthly versus CircleCI, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Earthly and CircleCI have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include build, automation, monorepo.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Earthly and CircleCI significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include build, automation, monorepo, caching.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include build, automation and cicd, testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Earthly and CircleCI. You might also explore build, automation, monorepo for alternative approaches.

Feature Earthly CircleCI
Overall Score N/A 1
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Earthly
Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

CircleCI
CircleCI

Description: CircleCI is a continuous integration and delivery platform that helps developers automate building, testing, and deploying applications. It offers cloud-based infrastructure for running jobs in Linux containers along with insights through analytics and monitoring.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Earthly
Earthly Features
  • Declarative build definitions
  • Automatic caching and parallelization
  • Built specifically for monorepos
  • Integration with Docker containers
  • Support for incremental builds
  • Cross-platform support
CircleCI
CircleCI Features
  • Cloud-based CI/CD platform
  • Supports multiple languages and frameworks
  • Parallel test splitting
  • Configurable workflows
  • Artifact storage
  • Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, etc.

Pros & Cons Analysis

Earthly
Earthly
Pros
  • Fast and reproducible builds
  • Simplifies build configuration
  • Improves developer productivity
  • Makes dependency management easier
  • Good for large, complex projects
Cons
  • Limited adoption so far
  • Steep learning curve
  • Less flexibility than general build tools
  • Only supports Docker containers
  • Mainly aimed at monorepos
CircleCI
CircleCI
Pros
  • Easy setup and configuration
  • Fast build times
  • Scalable infrastructure
  • Detailed build logs and insights
  • Flexible pricing options
Cons
  • Can have a steep learning curve
  • No native support for Windows containers
  • Additional costs for more parallelism
  • Limited free plan

Pricing Comparison

Earthly
Earthly
  • Open Source
CircleCI
CircleCI
  • Free
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs