Earthly vs Concourse

Struggling to choose between Earthly and Concourse? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Earthly is a Development solution with tags like build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

It boasts features such as Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support and pros including Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

On the other hand, Concourse is a Development product tagged with automation, pipelines, build, test, deploy.

Its standout features include Workflow automation, Resource management, Job scheduling, Integration with source control, CLI and web UI, Access controls and security, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Easy to set up and use, Scalable, Integrates with many tools and technologies, Active community support.

Feature	Earthly	Concourse
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Concourse

Description: Concourse is an open-source continuous thing platform for automation of pipelines in software development. It provides resources and tasks that can be combined into pipelines to automate build, test, and deployment processes.

Key Features Comparison

Earthly Features

• Declarative build definitions
• Automatic caching and parallelization
• Built specifically for monorepos
• Integration with Docker containers
• Support for incremental builds
• Cross-platform support

Concourse Features

• Workflow automation
• Resource management
• Job scheduling
• Integration with source control
• CLI and web UI
• Access controls and security

Pros & Cons Analysis

Earthly

Pros

• Fast and reproducible builds
• Simplifies build configuration
• Improves developer productivity
• Makes dependency management easier
• Good for large, complex projects

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Steep learning curve
• Less flexibility than general build tools
• Only supports Docker containers
• Mainly aimed at monorepos

Concourse

Pros

• Open source and free
• Easy to set up and use
• Scalable
• Integrates with many tools and technologies
• Active community support

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Limited documentation
• Not as feature rich as some paid options

Pricing Comparison

Earthly

• Open Source

Concourse

• Open Source
• Free