Earthly vs GreenhouseCI

Struggling to choose between Earthly and GreenhouseCI? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Earthly is a Development solution with tags like build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

It boasts features such as Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support and pros including Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

On the other hand, GreenhouseCI is a Development product tagged with automation, testing, deployment, devops.

Its standout features include Automated build, test and deployment pipelines, Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab, Parallel test execution, Artifact management, Role-based access control, REST API, CLI access, Docker support, Kubernetes support, and it shines with pros like Easy to set up and configure pipelines, Good integration with popular code repositories, Scalable test execution, Flexible deployment options, Access controls for teams, APIs allow automation and custom integrations, Free tier available.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Earthly

Earthly

Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Categories:
Development Build Automation
build automation monorepo caching reproducible

Earthly Features

  1. Declarative build definitions
  2. Automatic caching and parallelization
  3. Built specifically for monorepos
  4. Integration with Docker containers
  5. Support for incremental builds
  6. Cross-platform support

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Fast and reproducible builds

Simplifies build configuration

Improves developer productivity

Makes dependency management easier

Good for large, complex projects

Cons

Limited adoption so far

Steep learning curve

Less flexibility than general build tools

Only supports Docker containers

Mainly aimed at monorepos

GreenhouseCI

GreenhouseCI

GreenhouseCI is a continuous integration and delivery platform designed for software engineering teams. It automates building, testing and deploying applications to help deliver higher quality code faster.

Categories:
Development Continuous Integration & Delivery
automation testing deployment devops

GreenhouseCI Features

  1. Automated build, test and deployment pipelines
  2. Integrations with GitHub, Bitbucket, GitLab
  3. Parallel test execution
  4. Artifact management
  5. Role-based access control
  6. REST API
  7. CLI access
  8. Docker support
  9. Kubernetes support

Pricing

  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Easy to set up and configure pipelines

Good integration with popular code repositories

Scalable test execution

Flexible deployment options

Access controls for teams

APIs allow automation and custom integrations

Free tier available

Cons

Less flexibility than self-hosted options like Jenkins

Can get expensive for larger teams

Missing some advanced features of competitors

Vendor lock-in