Earthly vs Travis CI

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Earthly icon
Earthly
Travis CI icon
Travis CI

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Earthly and Travis CI? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Earthly is a Development solution with tags like build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

It boasts features such as Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support and pros including Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

On the other hand, Travis CI is a Development product tagged with ci, testing, deployment, github.

Its standout features include Automated builds and testing, Easy integration with GitHub, Supports many languages and frameworks, Parallel testing, Caching for faster builds, Notifications via email, IRC, Campfire etc, Ability to deploy to various platforms, Customizable build configuration, Access to build logs, and it shines with pros like Free for open source projects, Easy setup with GitHub integration, Fast and reliable builds, Good notification options, Good documentation and community support, Many add-ons and integrations available.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Earthly and Travis CI?

When evaluating Earthly versus Travis CI, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Earthly and Travis CI have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include build, automation, monorepo.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Earthly and Travis CI significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include build, automation, monorepo, caching.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include build, automation and ci, testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Earthly and Travis CI. You might also explore build, automation, monorepo for alternative approaches.

Feature Earthly Travis CI
Overall Score N/A 1
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Earthly
Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Travis CI
Travis CI

Description: Travis CI is a hosted continuous integration service used to build, test, and deploy software projects hosted at GitHub. It is free for open source projects.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Earthly
Earthly Features
  • Declarative build definitions
  • Automatic caching and parallelization
  • Built specifically for monorepos
  • Integration with Docker containers
  • Support for incremental builds
  • Cross-platform support
Travis CI
Travis CI Features
  • Automated builds and testing
  • Easy integration with GitHub
  • Supports many languages and frameworks
  • Parallel testing
  • Caching for faster builds
  • Notifications via email, IRC, Campfire etc
  • Ability to deploy to various platforms
  • Customizable build configuration
  • Access to build logs

Pros & Cons Analysis

Earthly
Earthly
Pros
  • Fast and reproducible builds
  • Simplifies build configuration
  • Improves developer productivity
  • Makes dependency management easier
  • Good for large, complex projects
Cons
  • Limited adoption so far
  • Steep learning curve
  • Less flexibility than general build tools
  • Only supports Docker containers
  • Mainly aimed at monorepos
Travis CI
Travis CI
Pros
  • Free for open source projects
  • Easy setup with GitHub integration
  • Fast and reliable builds
  • Good notification options
  • Good documentation and community support
  • Many add-ons and integrations available
Cons
  • Limited free plan for private repos
  • Can be slow for larger projects
  • Limited customization on free plan
  • No native Windows or mobile support
  • No on-premises self-hosted option

Pricing Comparison

Earthly
Earthly
  • Open Source
Travis CI
Travis CI
  • Free
  • Freemium
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs