EaselJS vs melonJS

Struggling to choose between EaselJS and melonJS? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

EaselJS is a Development solution with tags like canvas, graphics, animation, interactivity.

It boasts features such as Canvas rendering, Shape and bitmap drawing, Built-in shape library, Sprite sheet animation, Mouse and touch interactions, Filters and blend modes, Text and bitmap fonts and pros including Lightweight and high performance, Cross-browser compatibility, Active development and support, Integrates well with other CreateJS libraries, Open source and free to use.

On the other hand, melonJS is a Games product tagged with javascript, 2d, game-engine.

Its standout features include Lightweight 2D game engine, Asset loading, Physics engine, Event handling, Animations, Isometric rendering, WebGL renderer, Mobile support, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast, Active community, Good documentation, Open source and free, Works across browsers and devices, Lots of built-in features.

Feature	EaselJS	melonJS
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Games

Product Overview

EaselJS

Description: EaselJS is a JavaScript library for building high-performance interactive 2D content using HTML5 Canvas. It provides an easy-to-use API for animation, interactivity, and graphic design capabilities.

melonJS

Description: melonJS is a lightweight JavaScript game engine for 2D games. It allows developers to easily create games, providing utilities for asset loading, physics, event handling, animations, and more out of the box.

Key Features Comparison

EaselJS Features

• Canvas rendering
• Shape and bitmap drawing
• Built-in shape library
• Sprite sheet animation
• Mouse and touch interactions
• Filters and blend modes
• Text and bitmap fonts

melonJS Features

• Lightweight 2D game engine
• Asset loading
• Physics engine
• Event handling
• Animations
• Isometric rendering
• WebGL renderer
• Mobile support

Pros & Cons Analysis

EaselJS

Pros

• Lightweight and high performance
• Cross-browser compatibility
• Active development and support
• Integrates well with other CreateJS libraries
• Open source and free to use

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Steep learning curve
• Not ideal for complex applications
• No 3D support

melonJS

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Active community
• Good documentation
• Open source and free
• Works across browsers and devices
• Lots of built-in features

Cons

• Less flexible than larger engines
• Limited 3D support
• Steeper learning curve than some engines
• Smaller asset store

Pricing Comparison

EaselJS

• Open Source
• Free

melonJS

• Open Source