Emails vs mailcow: dockerized

Struggling to choose between Emails and mailcow: dockerized? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Emails is a Social & Communications solution with tags like privacy, security, encryption, calendar, contacts.

It boasts features such as Robust spam filtering, Aliases to prevent tracking, End-to-end encryption, Calendar and contacts integration, Easy to use interface and pros including Focuses on privacy and security, Comprehensive set of features, Intuitive and user-friendly.

On the other hand, mailcow: dockerized is a Network & Admin product tagged with docker, email, postfix, dovecot, sogo, rainloop, postfixadmin.

Its standout features include Self-hosted email server, Webmail client (Rainloop), Contacts/calendar sync (SOGo), Spam filtering (Rspamd), Email encryption (TLS), Web admin interface, Auto configuration for email clients, Scalable - uses Docker containers, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Secure - supports TLS encryption, Feature-rich - bundles many email components, Easy to deploy - uses Docker containers, Good spam filtering with Rspamd, Webmail and calendar/contacts included.

Feature	Emails	mailcow: dockerized
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Social & Communications	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Emails

Description: An email service that focuses on privacy and security while still being easy to use. Offers robust spam filtering, aliases to prevent tracking, encryption, calendar and contacts.

mailcow: dockerized

Description: mailcow: dockerized is an open source email server that runs on Docker. It bundles common email components like Postfix, Dovecot, SOGo, Rainloop, PostfixAdmin, and more into easy-to-use containers.

Key Features Comparison

Emails Features

• Robust spam filtering
• Aliases to prevent tracking
• End-to-end encryption
• Calendar and contacts integration
• Easy to use interface

mailcow: dockerized Features

• Self-hosted email server
• Webmail client (Rainloop)
• Contacts/calendar sync (SOGo)
• Spam filtering (Rspamd)
• Email encryption (TLS)
• Web admin interface
• Auto configuration for email clients
• Scalable - uses Docker containers

Pros & Cons Analysis

Emails

Pros

• Focuses on privacy and security
• Comprehensive set of features
• Intuitive and user-friendly

Cons

• Limited free plan
• Fewer integrations compared to some competitors
• May have a learning curve for some users

mailcow: dockerized

Pros

• Free and open source
• Secure - supports TLS encryption
• Feature-rich - bundles many email components
• Easy to deploy - uses Docker containers
• Good spam filtering with Rspamd
• Webmail and calendar/contacts included

Cons

• Complex initial setup
• Requires Linux server and Docker knowledge
• No official paid support options
• Limited mobile app support
• Less user-friendly than commercial options

Pricing Comparison

Emails

• Freemium
• Subscription-Based

mailcow: dockerized

• Open Source