emqtt vs CrystalMQ

Struggling to choose between emqtt and CrystalMQ? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

emqtt is a Network & Admin solution with tags like mqtt, iot, messaging, broker.

It boasts features such as Distributed server cluster, MQTT v3.1/3.1.1/5.0 protocol support, QOS0/1/2 publish-subscribe support , Persistent message queue, Retained messages, Last Will messages, WebSocket and STOMP support, Bridge to other MQTT brokers, Plugin support for authentication and authorization, Enterprise-grade security and pros including High performance and scalability, Open source with active community, Supports wide range of platforms, Easy to deploy and configure, Built-in clustering and redundancy, Supports bridging to other protocols, Extensible through plugins.

On the other hand, CrystalMQ is a Network & Admin product tagged with messaging, queueing, distributed-systems.

Its standout features include Open source and free, Supports a variety of messaging protocols like AMQP, MQTT, STOMP, High performance and low latency, Horizontally scalable through sharding, Persistence using Redis or PostgreSQL, Supports clustering for high availability, Plugin architecture for extendibility, Admin dashboard and REST API for management, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast compared to many commercial MQ servers, Very scalable for high throughput needs, Supports many developer-friendly protocols out of the box, Easy to deploy, manage, and monitor, Open source with active community support.

Feature	emqtt	CrystalMQ
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

emqtt

Description: emqtt is an open-source, scalable, distributed MQTT message broker that supports a wide range of network transport protocols. It is written in Erlang/OTP and provides features such as persistent sessions, queueing, clustering, bridges and enterprise-grade security.

CrystalMQ

Description: CrystalMQ is an open-source message queuing software that enables asynchronous message-based communication between distributed applications. It is lightweight, fast, and scalable.

Key Features Comparison

emqtt Features

• Distributed server cluster
• MQTT v3.1/3.1.1/5.0 protocol support
• QOS0/1/2 publish-subscribe support
• Persistent message queue
• Retained messages
• Last Will messages
• WebSocket and STOMP support
• Bridge to other MQTT brokers
• Plugin support for authentication and authorization
• Enterprise-grade security

CrystalMQ Features

• Open source and free
• Supports a variety of messaging protocols like AMQP, MQTT, STOMP
• High performance and low latency
• Horizontally scalable through sharding
• Persistence using Redis or PostgreSQL
• Supports clustering for high availability
• Plugin architecture for extendibility
• Admin dashboard and REST API for management

Pros & Cons Analysis

emqtt

Pros

• High performance and scalability
• Open source with active community
• Supports wide range of platforms
• Easy to deploy and configure
• Built-in clustering and redundancy
• Supports bridging to other protocols
• Extensible through plugins

Cons

• Limited user management features
• No graphical user interface
• Steep learning curve for configuration
• Requires expertise with Erlang/OTP
• Not ideal for small scale deployments

CrystalMQ

Pros

• Lightweight and fast compared to many commercial MQ servers
• Very scalable for high throughput needs
• Supports many developer-friendly protocols out of the box
• Easy to deploy, manage, and monitor
• Open source with active community support

Cons

• Lacks some advanced features of commercial MQ servers
• Limited documentation and examples
• Not ideal for complex routing logic
• UI is basic compared to some alternatives

Pricing Comparison

emqtt

• Open Source
• Free
• Custom Pricing

CrystalMQ

• Open Source