emqtt vs VerneMQ

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

emqtt icon
emqtt
VerneMQ icon
VerneMQ

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between emqtt and VerneMQ? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

emqtt is a Network & Admin solution with tags like mqtt, iot, messaging, broker.

It boasts features such as Distributed server cluster, MQTT v3.1/3.1.1/5.0 protocol support, QOS0/1/2 publish-subscribe support , Persistent message queue, Retained messages, Last Will messages, WebSocket and STOMP support, Bridge to other MQTT brokers, Plugin support for authentication and authorization, Enterprise-grade security and pros including High performance and scalability, Open source with active community, Supports wide range of platforms, Easy to deploy and configure, Built-in clustering and redundancy, Supports bridging to other protocols, Extensible through plugins.

On the other hand, VerneMQ is a Network & Admin product tagged with mqtt, broker, messaging, iot, erlang.

Its standout features include Built-in MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 support, QOS 0, 1 and 2 support, SSL/TLS support, Websockets support, Clustering for high availability, Pluggable authentication and authorization, Bridge support to bridge topics between brokers, Distributed queues for scaling to extreme loads, Plugin architecture to extend functionality, High performance and low memory footprint, and it shines with pros like Open source and free to use, High performance and scalability, Built-in clustering for high availability, Supports latest MQTT protocol versions, Easy to deploy and configure, Active community support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare emqtt and VerneMQ?

When evaluating emqtt versus VerneMQ, both solutions serve different needs within the network & admin ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

emqtt and VerneMQ have established themselves in the network & admin market. Key areas include mqtt, iot, messaging.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between emqtt and VerneMQ significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include mqtt, iot, messaging, broker.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include mqtt, iot and mqtt, broker.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between emqtt and VerneMQ. You might also explore mqtt, iot, messaging for alternative approaches.

Feature emqtt VerneMQ
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Network & Admin Network & Admin
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

emqtt
emqtt

Description: emqtt is an open-source, scalable, distributed MQTT message broker that supports a wide range of network transport protocols. It is written in Erlang/OTP and provides features such as persistent sessions, queueing, clustering, bridges and enterprise-grade security.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

VerneMQ
VerneMQ

Description: VerneMQ is an open-source, high-performance MQTT messaging broker written in Erlang. It is scalable, fault-tolerant and easy to set up. VerneMQ can handle thousands of MQTT clients on a single server instance.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

emqtt
emqtt Features
  • Distributed server cluster
  • MQTT v3.1/3.1.1/5.0 protocol support
  • QOS0/1/2 publish-subscribe support
  • Persistent message queue
  • Retained messages
  • Last Will messages
  • WebSocket and STOMP support
  • Bridge to other MQTT brokers
  • Plugin support for authentication and authorization
  • Enterprise-grade security
VerneMQ
VerneMQ Features
  • Built-in MQTT 3.1 and 3.1.1 support
  • QOS 0, 1 and 2 support
  • SSL/TLS support
  • Websockets support
  • Clustering for high availability
  • Pluggable authentication and authorization
  • Bridge support to bridge topics between brokers
  • Distributed queues for scaling to extreme loads
  • Plugin architecture to extend functionality
  • High performance and low memory footprint

Pros & Cons Analysis

emqtt
emqtt
Pros
  • High performance and scalability
  • Open source with active community
  • Supports wide range of platforms
  • Easy to deploy and configure
  • Built-in clustering and redundancy
  • Supports bridging to other protocols
  • Extensible through plugins
Cons
  • Limited user management features
  • No graphical user interface
  • Steep learning curve for configuration
  • Requires expertise with Erlang/OTP
  • Not ideal for small scale deployments
VerneMQ
VerneMQ
Pros
  • Open source and free to use
  • High performance and scalability
  • Built-in clustering for high availability
  • Supports latest MQTT protocol versions
  • Easy to deploy and configure
  • Active community support
Cons
  • Limited user management capabilities
  • Not as feature rich as some commercial options
  • Limited documentation and guides
  • No graphical user interface
  • Steep learning curve for some advanced features

Pricing Comparison

emqtt
emqtt
  • Open Source
  • Free
  • Custom Pricing
VerneMQ
VerneMQ
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs