Endtest vs CrossBrowserTesting

Struggling to choose between Endtest and CrossBrowserTesting? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Endtest is a Development solution with tags like load-testing, performance-testing, web-application-testing.

It boasts features such as Record and replay scripts to simulate user interactions, Support for multiple protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, SOAP, REST, FTP, and more, Distributed load testing using multiple machines, Detailed performance metrics and customizable reports, Command line interface and integration with CI/CD pipelines, Open source and self-hosted option available and pros including Free and open source, Easy to use interface, Support for advanced scripting and extensibility, Scales to thousands of concurrent users, Detailed and customizable analytics.

On the other hand, CrossBrowserTesting is a Online Services product tagged with crossbrowser-testing, web-application-testing, browser-compatibility, responsive-testing.

Its standout features include Test website on 2000+ real browsers and devices, Automatic screenshots and videos, Visual bug reporting, JavaScript Error logging, Page speed insights, Accessibility testing, Geolocation testing, Network throttling, Automated testing with Selenium, and it shines with pros like Saves time compared to manual testing, Wide range of browsers and devices, Easy to use interface, Good for responsive design testing, Integrates with popular tools like Selenium.

Feature	Endtest	CrossBrowserTesting
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Online Services

Product Overview

Endtest

Description: Endtest is an open-source load and performance testing tool for web applications. It allows users to simulate large numbers of virtual users accessing a web application to test overall system performance and capacity.

CrossBrowserTesting

Description: CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud-based web application testing tool that allows users to test their websites and web apps across various browsers, operating systems and devices. It aims to provide comprehensive cross-browser compatibility testing.

Key Features Comparison

Endtest Features

• Record and replay scripts to simulate user interactions
• Support for multiple protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, SOAP, REST, FTP, and more
• Distributed load testing using multiple machines
• Detailed performance metrics and customizable reports
• Command line interface and integration with CI/CD pipelines
• Open source and self-hosted option available

CrossBrowserTesting Features

• Test website on 2000+ real browsers and devices
• Automatic screenshots and videos
• Visual bug reporting
• JavaScript Error logging
• Page speed insights
• Accessibility testing
• Geolocation testing
• Network throttling
• Automated testing with Selenium

Pros & Cons Analysis

Endtest

Pros

• Free and open source
• Easy to use interface
• Support for advanced scripting and extensibility
• Scales to thousands of concurrent users
• Detailed and customizable analytics

Cons

• Limited to web application testing
• Steep learning curve for advanced scripting
• Not as feature rich as commercial solutions

CrossBrowserTesting

Pros

• Saves time compared to manual testing
• Wide range of browsers and devices
• Easy to use interface
• Good for responsive design testing
• Integrates with popular tools like Selenium

Cons

• Can get expensive for large test suites
• Limited mobile testing features
• No end-to-end user journey testing
• Not ideal for complex web apps

Pricing Comparison

Endtest

• Open Source
• Free
• Freemium

CrossBrowserTesting

• Subscription-Based