Enonic XP vs Hippo Digital Experience Platform

Struggling to choose between Enonic XP and Hippo Digital Experience Platform? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Enonic XP is a Development solution with tags like opensource, java, cms, websites, intranets, web-apps, portals, content-modeling, templating, personalization, workflow, access-control, internationalization.

It boasts features such as Content Modeling - Flexible and extensible content models, Templating - Powerful templating and rendering engine, Personalization - Rules-based personalization and targeting, Workflow - Configurable review and approval workflows, Access Control - Granular access control system, Internationalization - Built-in i18n support, App Development - Java-based application development platform and pros including Open source with liberal license, Extensible and customizable via apps, Modern architecture and developer experience, Scalable for large deployments, Active open source community.

On the other hand, Hippo Digital Experience Platform is a Business & Commerce product tagged with cms, java, open-source, web-application, content-editing, templating, personalization.

Its standout features include Content Management, Content Editing, Templating, Personalization, Workflow Management, Integration with Front-end Systems, Multi-channel Content Delivery, Search and Navigation, Access Control and Security, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Highly extensible and customizable, Strong content management capabilities, Decoupled architecture, Enterprise-ready features, Active open source community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Enonic XP

Enonic XP

Enonic XP is an open-source Java-based content management system and application development platform. It allows building and managing websites, intranets, web apps and portals. Key features include content modeling, templating, personalization, workflow, access control and internationalization.

Categories:
opensource java cms websites intranets web-apps portals content-modeling templating personalization workflow access-control internationalization

Enonic XP Features

  1. Content Modeling - Flexible and extensible content models
  2. Templating - Powerful templating and rendering engine
  3. Personalization - Rules-based personalization and targeting
  4. Workflow - Configurable review and approval workflows
  5. Access Control - Granular access control system
  6. Internationalization - Built-in i18n support
  7. App Development - Java-based application development platform

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source with liberal license

Extensible and customizable via apps

Modern architecture and developer experience

Scalable for large deployments

Active open source community

Cons

Steeper learning curve than some CMSs

Not as widely used as WordPress or Drupal

Limited built-in ecommerce features


Hippo Digital Experience Platform

Hippo Digital Experience Platform

Hippo is an open source Java-based content management system and web application framework. It allows companies to manage and publish content on websites, intranets, extranets and portals. It includes features like content editing, templating, personalization and more.

Categories:
cms java open-source web-application content-editing templating personalization

Hippo Digital Experience Platform Features

  1. Content Management
  2. Content Editing
  3. Templating
  4. Personalization
  5. Workflow Management
  6. Integration with Front-end Systems
  7. Multi-channel Content Delivery
  8. Search and Navigation
  9. Access Control and Security

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Custom Pricing

Pros

Open source and free

Highly extensible and customizable

Strong content management capabilities

Decoupled architecture

Enterprise-ready features

Active open source community

Cons

Steep learning curve

Complex implementation for large projects

Limited native mobile support

Not as user-friendly as some proprietary CMSs